.
...with dictatorships?
If you're wanting to force women to have their children, why not go the whole way and rid everyone of their rights of choice?
Will you also be campaining against God for all the abortions HE's responsible for?
Or do you only pick on those you can easily gang up on?
As for "It's murder!" Well, have you looked in a dictionary recently?
(I know there are a few questions here, but if you read slow, you should do fine...)
2006-09-20 13:45:52 · 11 answers · asked by googlywotsit 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
poopshow: WOW! Gimmie more of that "christian" love! :D
2006-09-20 13:57:15 · update #1
Nikki: Stillbirths; miscarriages...you're actually trying to tell me these examples are the mothers decision!? Get real. If you believe in God, then it would be his will, surely!? (or would that be a good excuse to bring in Satan?)
2006-09-20 14:00:47 · update #2
Charles D: No. It's far from being a child. You are emotional. Control yourself, it's embarrassing.
2006-09-20 14:07:02 · update #3
Abortion is a personal decision between a woman and God. It is no one else's business.
2006-09-20 13:49:51 · answer #1 · answered by Gorgeoustxwoman2013 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Women have a choice not to get pregnant. They can NOT have sex until marriage. They can use birth contol. They can put an unwanted child up for adoption. Did I give you too many options?
God does not abort babies. Sometimes abnormalities occur and some women loose a child, blame satan NOT God!
All good things come from God!
Intentionally ending a life is murder. The only debate is when does life start, and if you believe the Bible, it starts when you are still in your mothers womb.
2006-09-20 13:57:27 · answer #2 · answered by shepherd 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well, people with guns should be careful with them, know how to use them, and the consequences of misuse. If they go off and someone dies, they have killed someone
Everyone knows sex can cause pregnancy. So if a baby is made, and the person doesnt want it, that baby dies. Why does the baby have to die? Why not just practice safe sex? Because people like you cannot understand personal responsibility.
Im gonna quote someone famous here. "its a poverty a child has to die so that you may live as you choose"
Get it? Likely not. I'll translate. Because a person was irresponsible, made a bad choice, and decided, selfishly, that they didnt want their life altered, a baby has to die. What about the baby? It's a child! A baby! The vitriolic tone of your question implies a complete lack of understanding, though, so you will likely strut around and claim your intellectual superiority rather than stop and think maybe you might have it wrong.
2006-09-20 13:55:59 · answer #3 · answered by Charles D 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
"Pro Life" or "Pro Choice" is a question of whether we believe life in the womb is worth saving or not. Once the baby is born, we don't give the woman the "right" to choose to kill it if she likes, so the question isn't primarily one of "choice" but of if the baby in the womb is a life or not.
We believe that child is as much alive as a 5-year old, so we are consistent in our belief that the woman's right is to take steps to avoid getting pregnant and then if she does get pregnant, to carry the baby to term and give the child up to someone who will love care for him or her if she is not willing or able to do so. If she can't care for her 5-year-old, we also ask that instead of killing her child she do the same thing.
Society has decided to remove lots of different choices from individuals. For example, you do not have the "right" to drive drunk or to take (or sell) drugs we have outlawed. You do not have the right to steal or to lie under oath or to have sex with minors. Just because we have removed some choices, doesn't mean that we have to remove all choice.
Since God is the origin of life and ultimately holds all life in his hands, we do not have a problem with God exercising his power and wisdom as he sees fit. We believe it is not for us to act in his place and "play God."
I know that there is a lot of logic here, but if you read slowly, you might be able to grasp it--maybe.
2006-09-20 14:09:55 · answer #4 · answered by happygirl 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
"Will you also be campaining against God for all the abortions HE's responsible for?" are you going to give some examples of when God was responsible for a woman aborting her child by her own decision?
2006-09-20 13:52:20 · answer #5 · answered by Nikki 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
People who are "pro-life" do not want to force women to have children. They want to protect children which the women have already chosen to conceive. And protecting human life is not unusual for the law, it protects you from being killed. I may want to kill you, but it's illegal, so I am being "forced" to let you live. Mothers may want to kill their already born children, but it's illegal, they are being forced not to. The law always applies some force.
What pro-life people are against is "direct abortion" not spontaneous abortions otherwise known as miscarriages. That happens naturally, not by human intervention. People die the same way, naturally, but you cannot "choose" to kill them.
By the way, the definition of murder, is the unjust taking of an innocent human life.
2006-09-20 14:19:01 · answer #6 · answered by jakejr6 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I had a son and a daughter, my son is a joy I can't imagine living without.
my daughter was killed in a car wreck when she was 21, 9 years ago, and the loss of her left a big hole in my heart I can not imagine how empty my life would be if both those children had been aborted.
2006-09-20 13:54:32 · answer #7 · answered by Hannah's Grandpa 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes murder would be taking a human life.
Please define for me in what way a baby in the womb is not a human life:
The baby has her own DNA
The baby has her own heartbeat
The baby has her own brainwaves
She has her own blood type, fingerprints, etc.
What is it exactly that a baby in the womb is missing in your mind before she can claim the protection any other citizen would have?
Yes, we would "force women to have their children"
We currently force men and women to support their children. You can be fined and imprisioned for neglecting your child. What is the magical moment when it is suddenly ok to start forcing a parent to take responsibility for her own children instead of neglecting, abusing, or murdering them?
If you say birth, what is different about the baby 10 minutes before birth? Ten days? Ten weeks?
2006-09-20 13:52:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
that's why I believe its hypocritical for a secular democratic country to ban abortion.
while I view abortion as immoral who am I to force my morality on others?
as for the murder thing maybe if legally a fetus is considered a human with full rights one can say killing it is Murder under the law but until its legally awarded rights I see no reason to ban abortion
2006-09-20 13:51:19 · answer #9 · answered by Gamla Joe 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Most Theists do believe in dictatorships, Is not having one god like a dictatorship?
2006-09-20 13:51:25 · answer #10 · answered by . 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋