anybody read the "The Case for Christ" ? it's book about christianity?

Question

1. How have Blomberg's responses to those eight evidential tests affected your confidence in the reliability of the gospels? Why?

2. Which of these eight tests do you consider the most persuasive and why?

what do u think about these questions?
please answer these questions.
I don't get what these questions want ..

Answer 1

I read the book and didn't get much out of it at the time. I wasn't ready for Christianity at the time, and found dozens of logical flaws.

I eventually did become a Christian, however. It happened when I changed my perspective.

Answer 2

1.)Blomberg seems to have some tests for the validity of evidence that the gospels may not stand up to. The question wants you to discuss whether or not you care if the gospels are "true" or "valid". Notice he says "confidence" and not "Faith" because that is what the point is, I think.
2.) Of those 8 ways to examine evidence (that you need to apply to the gospels before you can start either of these questions) which one of them strikes you as the most convincing.

Answer 3

My sister read it, but she's a moron. I am agenius, so I don't waste time with such nonsense. I saw it at a bookstore before Sis got it at the library. I'm rereading some 007 novels now when I'm not busy writing a book. Would you like to read "The Case Against Christ"? I'm working on "10,003 Contradictions in the Bible". I've had much of it printed in newspapers. I'm also doing, "10,003 Scientific Errors in the Bible". Want to read them when I finish them? Hey, be fair and give equal time to both sides!

Answer 4

I began reading it, but never did finish it. I thought from what I did read that he sounded pretty biased. And I am still not convinced in the reliablility of the gospels.

Answer 5

For now, read Mere Christianity by C.S. Lewis.

Answer 6

I simplest offered by ability of a tiny component to "The God delusion" whilst i found out it replaced into no longer something than the specific equivalent atheistic claptrap which you spot on those boards continuously. I skimmed something and it ordinary my suspicions again and again back. What Dawkins does is in basic terms as many impressive right here do.... Create a thoroughly special "version" of God than what human beings extremely think and then say that HIS version is stupid. He seems to cajole himself, although the incontrovertible fact that his version isn't what human beings stick to by no ability seems to go into his closed mind. He does the same old illogical atheistic ploy of insisting that the Bible could desire to be interpreted actually provided that he, and different atheists, has no answer for the great majority of Christians who do no longer interpret it actual. I theory i replaced into watching at yet another version of the fantastically dumb e-e book "The Passover Plot". purely considering the all people writes a e book that would not lead them to a student.

Answer 7

You will find a critical analysis of Bloomberg's eight tests here: http://jesuspuzzle.humanists.net/CTVExcerptsIntro.htm#Index

Answer 8

The Case Against God was far better.

Answer 9

It is a bunch of hogwash. I don't know how they expect to fool anyone with such nonsensical logic, or lack of logic.

Answer 10

No, I was too busy "reading" porn.