No. I don't believe in God. I can't prove the existence of a nonexistent nothing.
2006-09-20 10:51:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes, I do believe in God. I also see His marvelous creation as an obvious and in Romans Paul, inspired by God, said:
Romans 1:18-20
18The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, 19since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.
Simply by looking at creation, one can see the care and detail God has put into it. Just look at the bark on a tree, designs on leaves, 3-D clouds floating gently above the earth, the same clouds that can form into huge storms. Take a second to look at it, it's truly amazing! God bless!
2006-09-20 11:00:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by eefen 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Okay, I'll give that a yes and a no. Here's why.
God is there...in every Christian's heart, along with Good and Evil and Love and Hate. He is subjective.
God is not there...there is no firmament above the skies with windows to let the rain through to make our pastures grow, which will make our animals fat and healthy and need sacrifices to keep the 'ball rolling'. There is no objective God.
2006-09-20 11:09:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by eantaelor 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Belief in God is about faith. Without faith, the concept of God is nothing but an empty promise that certain behaviors in life will bring you rewards in death.
Just as you are under no obligation to prove to me that God doesn't exist, I am under no obligation to prove that God does exist.
2006-09-20 10:54:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The question is, “Can you prove God exists?” or some variation on that query. To fairly answer we must establish who God is, then find the verifiable evidence for His existence. Since the question is not about that which God has done, we do not need to discuss His attributes, just His existence.
Jesus Christ of Nazareth is the God of born again Christians. The archaeological evidence for his existence is manifold. You can verify some of it for yourself at http://www.sonic.net/sentinel/rhjesus.html
God exists.
Now can we PLEASE put this silly question to rest?
2006-09-20 10:53:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Pearly Gator 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The proof is all over the world. Earth is the only planet that contains life. It is so green and beautiful. Oceans of water that contains life. Human life. God created the Heaven and Earth. God created you. So what more proof do you need?
Lets reverse your question. You prove to us, that He doesn't exist . Our proof is greater, then yours.
2006-09-20 11:05:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Norskeyenta 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes I believe in God! There are many reasons, but I'll only list a few. He has never given me a reason not to believe in him. He created us, I believe that cause I don't think so many unique people could have evolved from unintelligent life. How do you explain people getting healed? If they have enough faith God will heal them. He doesn't let his children die, his children choose to die. I hope this made some sense. These are only a few reason why I believe in God.
2006-09-20 11:00:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here is a joke I once heard; A little girl and boy were at school one day. The teacher was teaching on "evaluation".
The teacher ask Suzie ;(we will just say thats her name). Susie is there any trees outside? she said; yes. Teacher asked her is there any grass outside? she; said yes I see the grass. The teacher ask do you see the sky? Suzie replied; yes I see the sky. The teacher then ask her ; now can you see GOD? Suzie replied why no teacher I cant see GOD. Teacher said if you cant see him then he must not exist.
The little boy over heard all that Suzie had been taught. The little boy told Suzie; (we will call him Tommy). Hey Suzie I heard what the teacher just taught you. I have a few questions ask you myself. Suzie said OK Tommy go ahead. Tommy ask; can you see the trees? Suzie says yes. Can you see the grass. Suzie says yes. Can you see the sky? Suzie says Tommy I told the teacher the answers to everything your asking me. Tommy says; OK. Then can you see the teachers brains? Suzie says no. Well according what you were just taught. Then the teacher must not have any!!!
To answer your question YES I BELIEVE in GOD!! (GOOD ORDERLY DIRECTION. )God!
2006-09-20 11:10:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is this enough data to make you understand that we have evidence?
Dr. Stanley Miller and Dr. Sidney Fox were two of the first scientists to attempt laboratory experiments aimed at trying to prove that life could arise spontaneously. They designed a Pyrex apparatus containing methane, ammonia, and water vapor, but no oxygen. Through this mixture they passed electric sparks to simulate lightning strikes. What was the result? No life was produced, of course, but the electricity did combine some atoms to form amino acids. Did the Miller/Fox experiment prove that life could eventually have arisen in some ancient sea struck by lightning? No, their results actually weakened the case. The mixture of amino acids and other simple chemicals produced is not correct for producing life. All known life uses amino acids which are exclusively of the "left-handed" form. left-handed molecules: a term used to refer to the "stereochemistry" of a molecule's construction; An amino acid can be chemically "left-handed" or "right-handed" in its orientation. These two forms are identical in their atoms, but opposite in their 3-dimensional arrangement. They are mirror images of each other. No known life can use any combination of both "right-handed" and "left-handed" amino acids. Adding even one "right-handed" amino acid to a chain of "left-handed" amino acids can destroy the entire chain! When amino acids are synthesized in the laboratory, there is always a 50% mixture of the two forms. Even if this overwhelming obstacle did not exist, far greater problems remain for the production of life. There are numerous reasons why the amino acids would disintegrate or never form in the first place. One chemist has calculated the immense odds against amino acids ever combining to form the necessary proteins by undirected means. He estimated the probability to be more than 10 to the 67th to 1 (1067:1) against even a small protein forming – by time and chance, in an ideal mixture of chemicals, in an ideal atmosphere, and given up to 100 billion years (an age 10 to 20 times greater than the supposed age of the Earth). Mathematicians generally agree that, statistically, any odds beyond 1 in 10 to the 50th (1:1050) have a zero probability of ever happening ("and even that gives it the benefit of the doubt!"). I could go on with this but I think this is getting to long and complex for a stupid christian to tell smart atheist about so I leave my reference and tell you that is enough non biblical evidence to answer your question... For the full story see http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/o...
Jim
2006-09-20 10:54:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe in God. And I believe that God exists in my mind. If you'd like to see, my mind is open Monday through Friday from 7am till 2 am, Saturday and Sunday from noon till 2 am.
2006-09-20 10:57:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋