So Evolutionist think we evolved from lower life forms. Big Bangers think we grew from premortal ooze. And Creationists think God made us in His image.
What if the Big Bang happened? What if the WAY in which God created the universe was by smashing two atoms into each other, thus creating the Big Bang? And from that collision was released energy which He compressed into mass which He formed into all the things of the universe. Perhaps some things were allowed to come together on their own and take their natural form in their own way, thus evolving from what they were into what they are. What if some of the first living things He created was the single cell organisims? Then He went on to create higher orders of animals, and finally man? And who's to say that evolution isn't God's way of changing creatures from an imperfect state into a more perfect state of existance?
Do you agree with me? If not, explain why.
Thanks.
2006-09-20 10:18:36 · 19 answers · asked by Tonya in TX - Duck 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
YDoncha, since energy can neither be created or destroyed, it has always existed, in and of itself.
But I think what your asking is who created the the first Creator? I don't know, but I've often wondered.
2006-09-20 10:35:48 · update #1
Cap'n: Try a peculiar Book of Mormon thumpin' Texan.
2006-09-20 10:36:55 · update #2
Why not all 3. We are puny humans, how dare we presume to know how God works, hell, we cannot Even say how long his day was.Maybe he started the big-bang, using it to create the universe and then programed evolution to bring us humans into being. When humans know all these things, we will have become God.
2006-09-20 10:23:18 · answer #1 · answered by utahraptor88 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
This answer will take a wail, so hang tight as i respond...
response:
Ok, you're theory of God creating the big band is a possability. I will not adress that any more. As for evolution, It's not biblical at all. In the book of Genesis is specifically explains that God created all the animals in the sea and air and land in different days. That proves against evolution biblically. Now, scientifically...
1) Where has macroevolution ever been observed? If an animals leg evolved into a wing, wouldn't it become a bad leg before it became a good wing? What about the arm, and the face, and the digestice track?
2) If macroevolution happened, where are the billions of transitional fossols? There's not just a "missing link" There a ten-mile long chain of missing link from only one stage to the next.
3) How could the first living cell begin?
4) Which came first: DNA, or the proteins needed by DNA, which can only be produced by DNA?
5) The most scientific dating outbrakes and techniques state that the earth and the universe are young.
Also, don't get macroevolution (From monkey to human) confused with the proven theory, microevolution (From Dog to golden retriever, and to German Shepard, and the terrier, etc.)
2006-09-20 10:21:50 · answer #2 · answered by Lord_French_Fry 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
First you have to get your science straight, you are confusing the big bang theory with abiogenesis, and an evolved organism isn't necessarily higher than it's predecessor. Also, the big bang and evolution are separate theories, however under the umbrella of science they are parts of the explanation of the bigger picture.
You have a hypothesis... here's what you do now. Find evidence that supports your hypothesis, conduct experiments, figure out the math, whatever you need to do to see if your hypothesis holds water. If it does, attempt to have your findings published in a peer reviewed scientific journal. If your hypothesis is not fulfilled then you abandon it or modify it and try again.
This is called scientific method. Until you fulfill these requirements and your hypothesis is accepted as theory, it will not be taken seriously. You can't just come up with an idea... Test it.
2006-09-20 10:25:57 · answer #3 · answered by ChooseRealityPLEASE 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well I disagree because your starting point is God. Unproven and unprovable only because anyone who is Christian should be able to perform miracles....but each and every one seem to 'choose' not to do it. Just go on television and, with the power of God, move a mountain into the sea...if there was such a thing as super-natural power somebody would have done it by now. (Yea, yea...all the saints...sure)
I don't believe that the Big Bang Theory is provable either. I do believe in evolution by natural selection because that is the only reasonable explanation why bacteria and virii (viruses) keep adapting to our immune systems and coming back for more.
As to how life started...well God is not a good answer because God would have to be alive before that now wouldn't He? How can life start by a living being starting it? Instead of, "He has powers beyond your imagination!", it's more like, "You guys have really vivid imaginations!"
Someday someone is going to do a really long experiment and put together a bunch of dead chemicals and come up with life! Religous people will just ignore him/her.
2006-09-20 10:50:09 · answer #4 · answered by eantaelor 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree
in the Qur'an there is a verse which can be explained by the big bang...so God may have created the universe from that unknown "to us" matter
the same for evolution it doesn't mean that God didn't create humans and everything but it was part of his creation..In the Qur'an again there is verse stating that everything alive was created from water..and that humans where created from Earth..And science has proved that this was right
more info read "The Bible, Qur'an and Science" for Maurice Bucaille..it is a great book.
2006-09-20 11:03:17 · answer #5 · answered by mido 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If I were to go by Creationism (which I don't), most creationists actually say that evolution did not happen at all, and all forms of life, including humans, were created as they appear today. However, I do not believe that is the case. I believe in evolution, since there seems to be more evidence proving this than there is proving creationism.
2006-09-20 10:23:08 · answer #6 · answered by Bonusround100 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No - I do not agre with you. Mostly because I do not beleive in the concept of a God.
But let me ask you this. A law of physics states that energy cannot be created or destroyed - it can only be converted from one object into another. With that being a known fact.......who "Created" the energy for this God of yours to make two atoms smash together??
2006-09-20 10:25:21 · answer #7 · answered by YDoncha_Blowme 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What you have just described is theistic creation & evolution.
This is effectively no different than accepting the scientific version 100% but adding that, "god was there nudging it along."
In science, the version of a hypothesis or theory that requires the fewest a priori assumptions, or invented causal agents, is viewed as the most likely. Since you accept the scientific version 100% except the addition of god, why the need for god? Just accept the 100% science version and move on.
2006-09-20 10:23:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
good observation/theory with incorporating all three ideas into one. I really dont agree in any part of evolution, Creation or the big bang. I exist therefore I am. Stresses of life overwhelm society, such as myself to even stop and think of how I got here. I try to make due with the time I have right now.
2006-09-20 10:35:01 · answer #9 · answered by dijay 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You have all these "What if's". You have to start with faith.Evolutionists have faith in evolution since there is no proof of it,and they build theories from there. Creationists have faith in Moses' account of our beginning and live accordingly. There is no support for the Big Bang, there is more evidence against it in fact.Do the research and see where you put your faith before you make a hypothesis.
2006-09-20 10:29:50 · answer #10 · answered by created 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋