English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-20 09:37:19 · 3 answers · asked by Zero E 1 in Arts & Humanities Visual Arts Photography

Than how long were the exposure times when the lighting condition was good?

2006-09-20 09:47:24 · update #1

3 answers

Well, it varied - from 30 seconds to 15 minutes or longer.
See the links below.

2006-09-20 09:49:38 · answer #1 · answered by johnslat 7 · 0 0

The 1850's marked sort of a cusp or shall I say transition period in early photography from the first practical photographic process called the Daguerreotype process, and the newer glass collodion process which began to emerge in the early 1850's. Each process is uniquely different and exposure times really varied. Initially Daguerreotype portaits would take several minutes. However, the Pezval lens, the first mathematically designed lens, made portraits much faster and less painful to the sitter.
This lens of course was adapted for later use in cameras designed for the newer Collodion process, but again with collodion you could be sitting for a minute to have your portrait taken, hence the reason for these medival looking neck and back braces that supported the sitter and prevented movement.
Though making a collodion or daguerreotype processes requires using specific chemical formulas and processes, there were variations amongst each photographer, and a good photographer could more or less make a photo at best under a minute. So in regards to what were the times, the answer is this, it depends, but lets just say that for portraits a minute or more was not uncommon. If you want to learn more go to alternativephotography.com

2006-09-21 10:01:06 · answer #2 · answered by wackywallwalker 5 · 0 0

Depends on the lighting conditions.

2006-09-20 16:45:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers