I love all this backtracking the christians are doing now...priceless.
2006-09-20 07:49:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by mutterhals 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
The Bible itself does not make the claim that the earth is only some 6,000 years old. The problem is that too many interpreters read into the Scriptures this understanding.
The book of Genesis contains the national sagas of ancient Israel in the form of poetry, song, story, genealogies and histories. As such it is a valuable record of this people's encounter and relationship with God (as well as for guidance and insights into our own contemporary relationship with God), but it is not an anthropological or science text, and should not be used, in my opinion, to account for (or discount!)earlier ages, peoples, creatures and biologic processes that are not within its scope of knowledge.
2006-09-20 07:49:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ponderingwisdom 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The dating is bogus radiocarbon dating is only good for 5,000 years plus it another fraud like the alleged piltdown man and other well known frauds the Bible says of mankinds exhistance dates from 4026 BCE the earth is a lot older than mankind and over the years some disreputable alleged scientists have tried to pull all kinds of frauds only to discovered later and proven wrong as usual Gorbalizer
2006-09-20 07:47:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by gorbalizer 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Of course the earth isn't 6,000 years old. Anyone who believes that has their heads completely buried in the sand. Every single scientific discipline, from geology to cosmology to paleontology to biology and all the others have substantial proof that the earth is somewhere around 4.5 BILLION years old. The evidence is overwhelming, comes from thousands of sources, is cross-verified by all of the sciences, and has been verified over hundreds of years by thousands and thousands of different scientists from all countries and of all religious persuasions.
Given that, the recent find is just another piece of the puzzle that helps us better understand our history, our evolution, and the timelines that underscore life on earth. This one single piece of evidence only adds another small piece to the already overwhelming data that verifies the age of the earth and the evolution of life on it.
Of course, the nutcases who believe the earth is only 6,000 or so years old never actually LOOK at any of the scientific evidence, and probably couldn't understand it if they did, because of their ignorance and closed minds...so they'll tell you that carbon dating is unreliable (it isn't, and doesn't matter if it is, as there are multiple ways of verifying dates of fossils), etc. Sad, ignorant, silly people.
2006-09-20 07:47:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
i'm a Christian, & I even have in no way cried hoax, i believe in a prehistoric international, it extremely is all interior the bible, if human beings purely make an effort to earnings, ONE be conscious can replace that entire image, In Gen 9:a million God instructed Noah to REPLINISH the earth, meaning to fill it up one extra time, & in Gen a million:28 God tells Adam & Eve to REPLINISH the earth or to fill it up as quickly as back. i will see God interior the Pehistoric international Juding Angels & his animal kingdom, & God observed what devil had even introduced to them interior the prehistoric international, So I see God shifting this planet far adequate removed from the sunlight to reason a ICE age, Then over thousands and thousands of years, God start to hold this earth back right into a dating with the sunlight. to heat it as much as as quickly as back carry on existence, Now the cave guy or wmona did no longer have a soul, They have been the utmost kind interior the animal kingdom, yet no soul, Adam & Eve did have a soul, hence they have been Son & daughter of God. The cave guy & woman that did no longer have a soul replaced into no longer a son or daughter of God. Now did I blow your techniques. Nw technological know-how is complaining approximately international warming, hogwash, God is slowly brining this plnet bck into an entire dating with thye sunlight to hve after the milleummium a appropriate climate because it wa back interior the backyard of EDEN.
2016-10-17 08:25:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since when did the bible say that the world was only 6000 years old?
2006-09-20 07:42:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Probably like this... the literal bible readers will say that you cant take the day as being literal now, and that a day could be 3.3 million years.
Some will say that its fake, some will say that carbon dating is fake, and some will say its a trick by satan to decieve us.
2006-09-20 07:42:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Rob 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
How the Heck they know it that old.
Since when did the bible say that the world was only 6000 years
Did God tell us we was his first creation NO he didn't
2006-09-20 07:45:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
She can't be a modern human. Modern humans are only around 100,000 years old, tops. She must have been some sort of ancient ancester.
2006-09-20 07:46:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jeremy R 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No one with the intelligence and rationality that God gave the toothpick actually believes that the planet is less than millions of years old.
2006-09-20 07:42:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Either the Bible is wrong,or carbon dating is wrong.Or they are both wrong.There is no proof of the age of anything.There is no basis of comparison.There is no proof of the age of the scrolls,so who knows?I just wouldn't worry about it because it's unanswerable,anyway.
2006-09-20 08:05:59
·
answer #11
·
answered by kimberli 4
·
0⤊
0⤋