Twelve months into a strict low-GI, fish, plenty vegs, NO refined carbohydrates at all, RARE consumption of four-legged protein, has resulted into a 50% triglyceride fall -from 100 to 50-, but total cholesterol was unchanged in the same period.
How to account for this ?
All else being equal shouldn't both values have declined ?
Finally, on a relative-scale, which of the two is more significant in terms of risk ?
Thank you for your informed opinion.
2006-09-20
05:29:48
·
1 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Medicine
tom5551, thank you for the very informative
answer. I assume HDL+ LDL+ VLDL= total chol.
2006-09-20
21:15:10 ·
update #1
Thank you Doctor SN for your input.
(I've e-mailed you LDL details).
;?)
2006-09-20
21:18:48 ·
update #2