Because as per the eleventh chapter of Bagavad Gita, in the Universal Form shown by Lord Krishna, He is shown exactly as the monster description of Bible. Since that Universal Form was unbearable Arjuna says to take back that Form and show the amiccable smiling figure. Incidently Bhagavad Gita is said to be 5000 years old. Did the Bible writers copy the Monster version of Bible from Bhagavad Gita? Any other thoughts even not confining to this Q. frame work. 11 th chapter of Gita can be read from the following link http://www.saibaba.us/texts/jnaneshwari/chpt11.html
2006-09-20 01:33:57 · 5 answers · asked by jayakrishnamenon 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
a thoughtful question. quite probably you have a high chance of being correct in all your meditations. Gnostic Christians believe Jesus studied in India during the "missing years" of the New Testament (age 12 to30), and there has been interaction between the Middle East and India for thousands of years. Before Judaism, Middle Eastern religions had a lot in common with old Dravidian and Aryan beliefs which have been assimilated into Hinduism. Remember how the Jews were wiping out the followers of BA'AL everywhere they went? Ba'al, = Bel = Beli = Bile (Irish god) = Bali (Hindu island in Indonesia named after Aryan god). The co-relation is obvious and the scope of the cult of Ba-al originates in ancient Sumeria and is spread from Ireland in the West to Bali in the East. The old testament bible is a crap book written by a bunch of murderous bigots and describes their destruction of the old global relgion which had a snake as the supreme god head. Hinduism has a great affinity with the snake as part of the divine, as do Australian Aborigines. St Patrick is credited with chasing the snakes out of Ireland, there were no actual snakes, they were the people that wore a snake symbol on their chest and worshipped the ancestor gods Bile and Hurakan. Christianity chased some of my ancestors from Ireland but they returned as Norman conquerors 600 years later. Hurakan also turns up in Meso-America. The correlations are clear. Rock on my meditative friend.
2006-09-20 01:54:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
no hindus r not d worshippers of satan. hindus worship lord krishna who is a god. wen u talk abt his universal form, krishna showed all forms of life. he showed that whole universe is within him. all stars , planets etc. everything was within his mouth. he also showed arjuna how a person takes birth and how he dies. on his right hand people were dying and on his left hand people were taking birth. it wasn't bearable 4 arjuna bcoz he was a simple human being. so hindus dont worship satan, hindus worship god only.
as far as copying an image frm bhagwad gita 2 bible is concerned, it wud b harsh 4 christians 2 admit this. but there is a possibility than christianity might hav took birth using hindu religious books bcoz hinduism came much b4 than christianity.
2006-09-20 09:28:37 · answer #2 · answered by crackluver007 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Bhagavad Gita Describes Krishna as Supreme God and not as Satan.
This is accepted by many great authorities and sages. While follower of Vedic culture have a very glorious past, we are all aware of how the so called Followers of jesus, Crucified Jesus himself and did not even protest.. and then so many tourcher chambers maintained by the church in the past.
Before 11th chapter, Krishna explains how those who cannot realize the personal form of God can still meditate on impersonal features of God’s energies. God being the causes of all causes as the light in Sun and moon and the taste in Water etc. Arjuna hence wanted to see this universal form of Lord. In that universal form, Arjuna sees God as the creator of Heaven as well as hell. God the giver of Birth as well as Death. Arjuna used to serve God or Krishna as Friend. and hence seeing such great position of God he was disturbed in that mood of service, and immediately offered Obeisances to God. He became not afraid but worried that he has been dealing with supreme God just as close friend, and hence must have commited many mistakes.
Your misconception is what happens when you read Bhagavad Gita from a wrong source.
Please Read Bhagavad Gita as it Is chapter 11 at,
http://www.bhagavadgitaasitis.com/en
Bible does call God as father, and Bhagavad Gita describes Krishna as Father too.
Vedic sages do also accept that Jesus studied religion in India during his missing ages and lived in Jagannath Puri. When Jesus was telling about God he was actually telling about Krishna.
We call him Jesus Christ, or the Son of Christ or God. Jesus himself said he is son of God. Christ word is derived from Greek word “Krista” meaning Love. And Greek derived form Latin. Latin and Sanskrit having many common words, Krista is same as Krishna in Sanskrit.
So Jesus was actually preaching about Krishna when he said God or Christ.
2006-09-21 09:42:48 · answer #3 · answered by Parsu 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
"God" or "Jesus" or "Mohammed" or "E=Meter" or any other kind of religion is very subjective. There is no point in trying to convince any one else of a religious thought. Religion is by nature not interested in facts, it is interested in faith. Therefore, the entire concept of discussing religion is moot. That is why there is no answer to your question. ;-)
2006-09-21 10:47:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
idk....but i know that like other religions..in the Bible...the beast...refers to powers or rulers of the earth just as it is explained in the bible....
and your religion is just one of those what the Bible would call "idolatrous practices" or worship of demon gods.
2006-09-20 08:38:46 · answer #5 · answered by Philadelphia 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋