...of dealing with human waste than mixing number ones and twos with copious amounts of water then flushing it into the sea?
2006-09-19 23:19:00 · 9 answers · asked by mesun1408 6 in Environment
Possibly not.
Frankly, Im not sure that the solution of dealing with the solid wastes of four million Londoners is any better, where they are dried and compressed into pellets (unfortunately termed ‘cakes’) and are then incinerated. I dont agree with flushing raw sewage into the sea, but Im not sure that literally burning *hit is a great idea either....
2006-09-19 23:29:56 · answer #1 · answered by Pington 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mmm possibly - but does the mean having 2 seperate toilets? one of no 1's and one for no 2's?? I don't think so. I think the way it is disposed is the only way really and that it is the sewage system that needs reviewing, maybe not flushing it into the sea is best - set fire to it and create more energy for electricity??!!!
2006-09-20 06:46:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think we already have good sewerage treatment plants and certainly not all countries flush it into the sea.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sewage_treatment
2006-09-20 06:31:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Composting toilets.
2006-09-20 07:51:33 · answer #4 · answered by keefer 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Put it in a rocket ship and send it to outer space. Gotta Blast!
2006-09-20 06:28:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think we should shite on the banks, they are always doing it on us.
As for taking the P, isn't the Government doing that?
2006-09-20 06:29:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
try doing it in seperate holes in the garden
then fill the holes in with dirt.
2006-09-20 06:28:41 · answer #7 · answered by nickfizzer 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yeah, check out humanure
2006-09-20 06:27:55 · answer #8 · answered by a tao 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No.
2006-09-20 06:21:41 · answer #9 · answered by b97st 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋