Andrew Luther ran to Mexico when he was out on bail to escape bail. Scott Peterson tried to do this as well but was caught prior to leaving. Do you think if we punish people for bringing Americans back we are setting a president that being wealthy can buy a person freedom?
Then anyone can do whatever they want to their fellow Americans and just run to mexico with no fear of extradition because Mexico wants their money.
Do you think this is a slippery slope to start walking?
This man had a revenge list in his journal so muder might have been on his list in the near future. He might not have stayed in Mexico forever.
2006-09-19 22:13:16 · 5 answers · asked by adobeprincess 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
Well Mexico shows no respect for our rules they even want their poor to come here. Should we really them take one of our people. If mexico would keep that guy forever that would be one think, but that Andrew Luther was planning to come back and take revenge. Money does talk. Many people have escaped punishment over the years and been embrased by other countries for the mere fact that they had money in a country of poverty.
2006-09-19 22:46:42 · update #1
*****************Sorrry that word is PRESIDENT This is how it sounds "press I dent"******************** I know it is a complex word of answers, but I am sorry. I am too tired to define it. Please look it up if you do not understand that word.
This is not the Word for the Comander in Chef or the Presedent of the USA. Please look it up.
2006-09-20 01:26:50 · update #2
sorry here are the definitions
My spelling is harming you. I am sorry and NASA boy can go get an education.
Main Entry: pres·i·dent
Pronunciation: 'pre-z&-d&nt, 'prez-d&nt, 'pre-z&-"dent in rapid speech 'pre-z&nt
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French, from Latin praesident-, praesidens, from present participle of praesidEre
1 : an official chosen to preside over a meeting or assembly
2 : an appointed governor of a subordinate political unit
3 : the chief officer of an organization (as a corporation or institution) usually entrusted with the direction and administration of its policies
4 : the presiding officer of a governmental body
5 a : an elected official serving as both chief of state and chief political executive in a republic having a presidential government b : an elected official having the position of chief of state but usually only minimal political powers in a republic having a parliamentary government
- pres·i·den·tial /"pre-z&-'den(
2006-09-20 01:33:38 · update #3
Here is the word I should have spellled correctly. Sorry.
entries found for precedent.
To select an entry, click on it.
precedent[1,adjective]precedent[2,noun]
Main Entry: 2prec·e·dent
Pronunciation: 'pre-s&-d&nt
Function: noun
1 : an earlier occurrence of something similar
2 a : something done or said that may serve as an example or rule to authorize or justify a subsequent act of the same or an analogous kind b : the convention established by such a precedent or by long practice
3 : a person or thing that serves as a model
2006-09-20 01:34:21 · update #4
Here is where I took these defintions from.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary
2006-09-20 01:36:47 · update #5
4 horrible answers please someone say something intelligent so I do not have to delete this question. I do not give a best answer if all I get is horrible junk.
2006-09-20 01:39:31 · update #6
Actually I have an "I do not know in here" I will gladly take that" I do not have to delete this, but if you can top that go ahead an try. It is not hard. Sorry for my spelling. I have asked yahoo for help on this and they did write back.
2006-09-20 01:41:56 · update #7
Curiously enough: unlike some of the others I was able to crack the code so I could understand that you used the word president for precedent. I hope the rest of their lives are not so fragile that they are thrown completly for a loop by a typo. I sincerely hope that they do not breed.
The Dog the Bounty Hunter case has nothing to do with respecting the laws of another country. If another country shields a person who has been convicted of 87 rapes and when being captuered is found to have the same date rape drug, their laws do not need to be respected. Do Mexican Fathers not want to protect their daughters from this?
I agree with the questioner, this has everything to do with corruption and wealth. You cannot tell me that in a poor country, that if you have a guy spending money and living lavishly the cops do not know who and what he is. Could they possibly have been paid off? What is the newfound motivation?
2006-09-20 04:01:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that if these maggots can run to Mexico and feel they are going to be OK then let them. Mexico would take real good care of Scott Peterson. That country is practically lawless and if you are not a Mexican yourself, then you are pretty much fair game. Even being a Mexican does not save you though. They would gladly kill their own. That is why most of them come running to the United States. It has nothing to do with mking money and all that. We know that for a fact because they are underpaid for teh work performed. THey may make more here than they do in Mexico, but the cost of living here is more as well so in the long run, they are running from the people there. I think so at least.
2006-09-20 05:20:58 · answer #2 · answered by HBPD 126 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The translation from NASA has arrived. They can't make heads nor tails of your "question".
What does a criminal hiding in Mexico have to do with the President?
Yikes.
2006-09-20 05:59:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
its not the matter of letting bounty hunter chase and apprehend suspected criminal (no conviction yet) it matter of the bounty hunter following the law and respect of the other country
2006-09-20 05:28:37 · answer #4 · answered by aldo 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
i do not know
2006-09-20 05:21:13 · answer #5 · answered by R D 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋