the illegals? I mean humane. Your insults and personal problems with them set aside. And i'm not asking for reasons no need to list why you would. We've seen them all. To give an answer such as lock and load shows your lack of intelligence to answer even the simplest questions.
2006-09-19 18:02:22 · 14 answers · asked by gidget lil bit 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
So sweet you need a life dude I have absolutly no allegience to anyone here your scary messages are just self serving. There are some here I respect even though we all have different views. If someone has done you wrong or has insuted you I am right there with you. I have had my serious opposers give it up dude seriously.
2006-09-19 18:27:17 · update #1
My opinion of the poem is mine alone I don't find it funny in the least I find it degrading and childish I want to fight my battles on a level of maturity which I see very little of on yahoo. But as I've said not one part of this forum is reality. My favorite question on here was from an anti illegal it was what job do you want after all illegals are deported. Not happening no one really wants it or not the ones who count in the long run.
2006-09-19 20:40:41 · update #2
Yars you took my comment about allegiance out of context I was refering to so sweet.
2006-09-20 18:59:57 · update #3
as per your usual you find one area try to pick it this time your out of bounds.
2006-09-20 19:00:53 · update #4
The only humane thing is to allow them to stay. I would think that standards could be set, such as contribution to society, do they have a productive job? (let them stay)... are they sapping society on welfare? (don't let them stay). I suppose if they don't have a jub you could require them to attend job search or skill upgrade classes and set a deadline. I think that all should be required to learn english. I don't think they should be sent back to their country if they are going to face torture or incarceration. I think if they commit crimes in their "adopted" country they should be deported immediately regardless of their fate in their own country.
Don't know if any of this made sense. Good question, well asked. I'm sure you'll still get the silly two word responses, after all this is a "points" game for some... 8)
2006-09-19 18:08:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Stop hiring them. Enforce labor laws and increase fines. Crack down on human traffickers and actually punish them(gasp). No medical except for emergency care( and I don't mean going into ER for cold meds, I mean actual emergency). No public school without the appropriate documentation. English is our language, and no country or language should be catered to. Nor should our schools be seperated into latino, Asian, or other groups when the children do not speak English. They children need to be taught English by immersion, together. Otherwise, they will live in their "us and them" world together. No one reaps the benefits of diversity when we stay in our own little subgroups. No welfare, S.S, etc. for non-citizens. Borders will be secured and agents will receive more training. Not checking the authenticity of documents was found by the FBI to be a problem at almost all our border check points. Day passes should be more closely regulated, since this is how most people come over and then overstay. No more anchor babies. Children are gifts, not leverage for citizenship and social services. The immigration process needs reformed, no one should be waiting more than five years to get an approval or denial. Family visas(immediate family, not the whole extended shebang) should be easier to get.
Screen people much more carefully, people with terrorist intentions have gotten in legally in the past and we need to learn from our mistakes. No city is a sanctuary, as no one is above federal law.
People who cannot find jobs will not come here illegally. People who will lose their jobs when caught will either start the legal process or return home. Those who do not will be deported. It may take time, but it took time for the problem to build up too.
2006-09-20 01:25:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Kill off what brings them here and they will leave on their own.
Everytime I read about building a wall to keep them out I laugh. No matter what we do they will continually come because we keep offering them work and free benefits. The only thing a wall will do is change the dominance of certain nationalities since the void will be filled from other countries.
The only way to get them to stop coming and to get those already here to leave is to go after those that make them want to come in the first place....
Aggressive action against the employers of illegal aliens. These people are the ones bringing them here. If there are no jobs to be had then whats the point in coming? Then enact and enforce welfare reform so only US citizens and Legal aliens have access to it. With no work and no free money from the US they will have no reason to stay. It will not happen overnight but it will reverse the tide within weeks, then after a few months the tide will head the other way.
2006-09-20 01:23:04 · answer #3 · answered by Tegeras 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If somthing is not done about them the groups of MS-13 will continue to grow. My local area hispanic group grew 36% of the last year! This is ludicris especially since more than 50% of the ones are illegal. In todays world you cannot just go to another country and expect to live. They have ruined the pay for many jobs that used to pay much higher such as a carpenter. They are dropping kids and then staying at home collecting subsidies because they are a minority with a american citizen as a child. My humane way of dealing with them is to take ALL of them who are illegal back to Mexico INCLUDING the ones who droped kids so they could stay. I know you could probobly never get rid of them all but it would cut down on the amount of them joining gangs as well as bring the qualities of living and the pay for some jobs back up. There needs to be very large fines for companies who hire them. I would then build a very large electricfied fence.
2006-09-20 01:26:07 · answer #4 · answered by trl_666 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Humane? "Round" them all up, hold them until there is verification of them being in this country legally or not. If illegal, they are on the next bus out of the country. No questions asked. All of their property becomes property of the US government, as does any money they may have. All family in this country are also sent back asap.
I don't agree in killing them. Illegal immigration hardly seems worth it. But I do think they should not be given amnesty. If we did that, we would be rewarding criminal behavior.
2006-09-20 01:20:03 · answer #5 · answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Physically evicting such a large force of invaders from this country needs to be done, but I doubt it can be done delicately. We need to cut off their supply. Jobs, benefits, money. We cannot continue to make it so comfortable here for them or they will never leave. And we want them to leave.
2006-09-20 01:07:21 · answer #6 · answered by Paladin 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Seriously, I think that if they aren't going to become legal and do it the right way, they should be mass deportations. That is what I think. That's humane and that's what should be done....in my opinion and let me thank you for always showing me respect even though we disagree on this issue.
2006-09-20 01:18:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
I honestly don't think the discussion is going to go very far until people feel like there is a handle and control of the situation going forward.
2006-09-20 02:02:00 · answer #8 · answered by DAR 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
lock and load is not a lack of intelligence, its more a fact that will be here, you think we would have said it if we were not planning it?
any ways the government isnt doing anything so that is the answer above
2006-09-20 01:19:09 · answer #9 · answered by NoBama For Me 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Your 'alliegience' is to whomever you pay taxes too, now your deluding yourself.
Deportation en masse in very humane. Shooting them would be inhumane in the absence of a war.
2006-09-20 12:20:53 · answer #10 · answered by yars232c 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋