When Bush says he does not understand the Geneva Convention, it means he does and knows torture is illegal and he is in violation of international law. Doesen't " clarification " mean redefining torture to make it legal? Someday he may be tried as a war criminal.
2006-09-19 15:20:15 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
yes, you're probably right
2006-09-19 15:29:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
And maybe the info we got from a "torture victim" kept you or a loved one from being killed in a terror attack. Cold rooms, sleep deprivation, and The Red Hot Chili Peppers played loudly doesn't constitute torture. Slowly beheading someone after beating them for days does. Where's your outrage at that? What about that "program"?
2006-09-19 15:31:06 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Boof 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no , clarification does not mean redefining torture
clarification
n 1: an interpretation that removes obstacles to understanding; "the professor's clarification helped her to understand the textbook
2006-09-19 15:35:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Perhaps, but if your evil enough to kill children, babies, cut a man's throat watch him jerk until he dies. Send your own children out with back packs not with books, but explosives.
Then I think the program needs to be in full swing.
Hire additional Proffessionals to run the Program.
Voting for a liberal is like inviting a suicide bomber to your local day care center.
2006-09-19 15:32:36 · answer #4 · answered by Rick D 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
There is no actual evidence that such places exist, other than in a smear campaign hatched by the Left. That, and in the minds of idiots who will literally beileve anything.
2006-09-19 16:23:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No.
2006-09-19 15:25:10 · answer #6 · answered by JAMES11A 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋