For a year or two, he was honestly right on par with Lance when it came to climbing. Now, he's a "middle of the pack" kind of guy. What happened to his form?
2006-09-19 13:37:45 · 5 answers · asked by conservativeguyfromnc 2 in Sports ➔ Cycling
Good question.
He was the man for a bit.
Pro cycling is funny. you can just have the longest run of bad luck. Look at LeMond.
That makes Armstrong's run so much more amazing. he pretty much always had good luck - and a little chemical good luck too, if you know what I mean.
2006-09-20 08:17:19 · answer #1 · answered by Jeff 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
He had bronchitis or mono or something like that and then was injured. I don't recall seeing any evidence of him being a doper. Too bad, he's a hell of a rider when he's on.
2006-09-20 12:23:43 · answer #2 · answered by kalaka 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes he was. It is a fact that all proffessional cyclists are dopers.. They just don't get caught... Well most of them.. Including Lance
2006-09-19 22:02:06 · answer #3 · answered by M-50 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes he was a doper , but Lance was even more of a dope head. And one day we will see the fire after we saw so much smoke.
2006-09-19 21:24:46 · answer #4 · answered by cyril 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, too many injuries in 2004 and 2005 have pretty much ruined that boys career!
2006-09-19 21:21:30 · answer #5 · answered by cyrenaica 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋