was at risk if you disagreed?
I know it's a hypothetical question I just want to see how many of you are so closed on the illegal thing. If you don't like the question bash me like you usually do.
2006-09-19 13:07:06 · 21 answers · asked by gidget lil bit 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
There would be a rebellion. No joke.
2006-09-19 14:29:38 · answer #1 · answered by DAR 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
examining the diverse solutions to this question purely affirms my theory that liberals have not have been given any clue. First, being interior the rustic illegally IS a criminal offense. the only civil offense is getting caught attempting to pass into u . s . a . at a time or place different than as specific by making use of immigration officers. should you no longer get caught and proceed to proceed into u . s . a ., then you definately've committed a criminal offense. working a end sign is a civil offense. working a end sign and killing a relatives of four is a criminal offense. 2nd, the theory that we choose immigrants to interchange an ageing inhabitants is such BS and the guy thinking this desires to have their head examined. With a extreme unemployment fee, noticeably between african individuals and mockingly adequate, hispanics, there are a number of criminal US electorate to interchange toddler Boomers. With a suffering financial gadget and shrinking ability to fund welfare courses, ANY U.S. citizen could be against amnesty
2016-10-01 04:00:42 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Define amnesty? As in make it not a crime to be here illegally? We're hardly enforcing as it is so what makes that so different than the present?
Citizenship? You mean immediately load a bunch of poor people into our medicare, medicaid, welfare & social security systems? Oh, that's a great idea - those programs are so sound & effectual. They are the model of fiscal responsibility and could easily handle such a shock.
I always love when liberals support opposing positions. Save our welfare state AND load millions of new people into it all at the same time. Great.
2006-09-19 13:17:42 · answer #3 · answered by Dubberino 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I would not support the President if he dispensed amnesty to all of the illegal invaders.
I would like to think that the government would not fall so far or become so corrupt as to revoke a citizenship for disagreement, but if the government was that biased, I wouldn't want to be a citizen of such a country at all.
2006-09-19 13:39:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Just give the whole world amnesty. What's more important people in Sudan: Darfuris demand action after women raped by the thousands or people from a war free country? Is Mexico now considered in worst condition then Iraq? It just goes around in circles there is no one amnesty. America will to have dedicate it's country to that cause to accommodate every country in the world
2006-09-19 13:35:19 · answer #5 · answered by Zoe 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I would not support it. All it would do is cause a stampede from every single third world county into the US to try to get in on it. Also from what I have seen first hand during the last Amnesty many people found ways around the restrictions.
2006-09-19 13:15:59 · answer #6 · answered by Tegeras 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I would never support Bush in any thing but I also would never give up my American citizenship,under any circumstances.But I would fight for his permanent removal from office/earth with my last breath.Not because of the illegal issue but for putting Americans in that position of having to choose.I hope that answers your question.
2006-09-19 14:05:45 · answer #7 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Why should ANYONE support amnesty for individuals that are breaking the law? The ILLEGAL aliens should not be rewarded when so many honest people are waiting in line to become citizens of this country. Why on earth do so many want to make our freedoms so easily available to those that do not respect our laws? Freedom is not free.
2006-09-19 13:19:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
NO.
Risk MY Citizenship for disagreeing? Not possible in this country.
2006-09-19 13:32:53 · answer #9 · answered by Firecracker . 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Anything that comes out of his mouth the majority of America dislikes..
Sooo..Guess I'm moving to Canada then, because I disagree.
2006-09-19 13:17:30 · answer #10 · answered by Ckarri` 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
i would support it as long as each case was thoroughlychecked out and new immigration measures were put in place. the current system doesn't work. it's too hard to come legally, and too easy to come illegally.
2006-09-19 13:10:48 · answer #11 · answered by advicemom 4 · 3⤊ 4⤋