2006-09-19 12:54:48 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
An atomic bomb implies only one!
Nagasaki and Hiroshima!
We lead by example! Can we say hypocrisy rhymes with democracy! How democratic is forcing your will on a sovereign nation?
Let's abuse the Geneva convention and be all high and mighty!
How embarrassing!
Sorry world!
2006-09-19 13:01:32 · answer #1 · answered by JFC I No 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yes it was the USA who dropped the bombs, during World War II.
Since then however, has the USA ever used one???
60+ years of restraint means something you know...
Iran on the other hand has no nukes...yet loves making threats of using them...maybe Iran meant "plague" or "anthrax"...not nukes...
2006-09-19 13:21:54 · answer #2 · answered by betterdeadthansorry 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ok, first off. When we dropped the two nukes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, we didn't realize that they would have such a prolonged effect on the Japanese people that repopulated those cities. Secondly, douche, this country has the things it does, because of it's actions long ago, go try and live in North Korea for a few weeks. You have more freedom than a lot of people ever will have, so thank your divine being that you aren't the toy of some genocidal maniac. Har har...don't even try and reverse that one.
2006-09-19 14:15:40 · answer #3 · answered by Kamikaze 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The USA, to stop a war and the death of millions of our servicemen and Japanese trying to invade Japan. Iran does not have the bomb yet but when they do they will not use it to stop a war or save the death of millions,no they will start a war with the death of about 5 million Jews and a million Arabs living in Israel.
2006-09-19 13:02:46 · answer #4 · answered by razeumright 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
it extremely is under no circumstances the country that invaded a pair of islands the place the interior sight inhabitants needed no component to the invaders ...... yet I digress ... the respond on your question is u . s . a . of america. although, u . s . a . of america used it extremely is atomic bombings to provide up a conflict, while the sensible funds is that Iran will use their nuclear weapons to blackmail their buddies or to start up a conflict. it is likewise no longer purely u . s . a . of america objecting to the Iranian nuclear application, yet all of it's buddies and a selection of of the international ..... sounds like a valid process action to me.
2016-10-17 07:23:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
USA, but if Iran is not stopped it will be the next and the victim will be Israel
2006-09-19 13:49:33 · answer #6 · answered by class4 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, the USA and may we always be the only country with first strike capability.
2006-09-19 13:00:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Actually it was a bomber, we still have not been able, to get
our Country to fly. Maybe its time, we drop another bomb !
Dr.Todschlag
2006-09-19 13:02:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Think about this...If Iran develops the bomb were going to have to strike first. do you want that or do you want Muslim extremists to make a hole out of D.C. or N.Y. or some other city here in the states! I for one think it's better to err on the side of national safety than to see that B.S. on CNN
2006-09-19 13:02:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Only one country has ever used nuclear weapons on civilians, and it wasnt Iran.
2006-09-19 12:57:15 · answer #10 · answered by Phil S 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋