English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

...encouraging a dangerous return to a primitive religious dogmatism against the intellectual freedom?

2006-09-19 08:57:25 · 2 answers · asked by jngameghino 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

imacatholic2: Is your comment a kind of threat?

If going against Freud, Marx and Darwin as if he were going to a crusade is not dangerous return to a primitive religious dogmatism against the intellectual freedom, well…

I don’t think that a person who base his arguments in the Bible book as a source of knowledge, even when simple nature facts contradict them, could be named as an “intellectual” (but of course is just my opinion)

Did I tell you I'm not agree with him?

2006-09-22 08:45:19 · update #1

2 answers

i dont read such ridiculous books.
a2a

2006-09-26 14:10:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Freedom of speech and intellectual freedom goes in all directions.

You need to be more specific about what you disagree with in Mr. Bork's book.

Labeling Mr. Bork's opinions as "a dangerous return to a primitive religious dogmatism" (whatever that might mean) instead of intellectually discussing and expressing disagreement with them may be seen as an attempt on your part to infringe on his intellectual freedom.

I personally agree with some of his views and disagree with others.

With love in Christ.

2006-09-22 15:28:54 · answer #2 · answered by imacatholic2 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers