English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

?

2006-09-19 07:53:05 · 19 answers · asked by harris r 1 in Pregnancy & Parenting Parenting

19 answers

Not really, NO.
I actually think it's lame but that is only my opinion.
Which you don't have to listen to.
Here are some other boy's name you might consider instead.
-Keegan
-Morgan
-Leland
-Alexander
-Patrick
-Conner
-Xavier
-Keith
-Chase
-Sage

2006-09-19 07:58:09 · answer #1 · answered by Tired-Mom 5 · 1 0

Heck yes.
One of my favorite characters in the cartoon series on Nickelodeon's Avatar: The Last Airbender.
He was only in two episodes, though.
*cough* Anyway, it's a really cool name!!


Dear Tired-Mom:

Those names suck.
Plain and simple.

Love,
Me

2006-09-19 17:30:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, it sounds like you are trying to name the kid some unique name of the future!

2006-09-19 14:55:31 · answer #3 · answered by brittypxo 3 · 2 0

No, it's a really stupid immature name for a boy, or a girl for that matter.

2006-09-19 18:50:53 · answer #4 · answered by toomanycommercials 5 · 0 0

If he's going to grow up to be a martial arts superstar or a teenaged secret agent, I see absolutely no problem with it

2006-09-19 14:57:28 · answer #5 · answered by Diva 2 · 2 0

That would be cool for either a boy or girl. I love unique names.

2006-09-19 14:54:22 · answer #6 · answered by MiMi 3 · 0 3

A boy puppy..yes
A human boy? No

2006-09-19 14:55:58 · answer #7 · answered by KathyS 7 · 2 0

i like it for a girl but YES that is cute we are naming our boy Ryder due Dec 28th

2006-09-23 12:42:39 · answer #8 · answered by Lindsey 2 · 0 0

I like B-52 bomber better.

2006-09-19 14:55:56 · answer #9 · answered by Chris 5 · 3 0

That's John Travolta's sons name.
It's ok.

2006-09-19 14:56:57 · answer #10 · answered by jevic 3 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers