Due to biomagnification it is very difficult for us to avoid the residues which enter the food web as a result of indiscriminate use of pesticides. The only probable way is to use the pesticdes much more judiciously (residues should be below the MRL value)or shift to organic farming.
2006-09-22 02:30:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by avhik B 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Survival of the fitest. But for how long ?? today there are aged people between 70 to 90, quite active., walking, talking, reading, writing without any support. Eating what others eat,.Drinking what others drink. Pesticide intake is far too low to kill instantly.Takes years to get into a disease.Each one of us is destined to die. How we die differs. So relax.Intake of pesticide leading to diseases and death is a part of life's cycle. so relax.Life your balance life happily and spread joy, happiness around instead of terrifying people.
2006-09-21 11:03:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Haresh Punjabi 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
for sure you have not been examining almost sufficient people did not "come from monkeys". people proportion a elementary ancestor with apes. Apes and monkeys are diverse (monkeys are those with the tail). The divergence of apes and people from a elementary ancestor purely happened as quickly as some 8 million years in the past. considering the fact that then, the two apes and people have been evolving alongside their very own separate paths. the traditional ancestor which produced the two apes and people now not exists. No-one outdoors misinformed religionists ever mentioned that people come from monkeys - I recommend which you easily study a e book approximately evolution written by potential of somebody who knows what they are speaking approximately quite than listening to some preacher or examining some religious pamphlet stacked packed with propaganda without foundation in actuality. to offer an answer in a context you ought to be waiting to narrate to: If Jews became Christians, why are there nonetheless Jews? Scientists "arise with those issues" on the grounds that's what the data tells us occurred. Scientists seem on the data and data and base their concepts around them, making genuinely specific that their concepts greater healthful each and each widely used and provable actuality and merchandise of information without exception. that's what evolution does - and has carried out for over one hundred fifty years.
2016-12-18 13:11:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by omparsad 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Till now we have survied. But then there is limit to everything. Use of pesticides should be limited in order to stay healthy and keep the environment clean and to protect the progeny from ill-effects from the same.
2006-09-19 12:21:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by chumbawamba 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
We have survived quote well, with far longer life spans now, on average, than before these chemicals started to be used. How do we do it? I don't really know, but since you and I and 6 billion other people are still alive, it is an incontrovertible fact that we do survive.
2006-09-19 08:02:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by campbelp2002 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
many chemical pesticides are used in our crops.they can be accumlate in them.by intake of food it will go into our body.maybe it will not show any sympton of disease.but it always have prolong effect on the human body.this peroid may be called latency period in which these perciside will not show its effect.but it accumlation can cause cancer and dangerous stmoach disease.
2006-09-19 08:10:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by nehia 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Intake of pesticides in small and diluted form is not harmful but prolonged intake of the same is injurious.
2006-09-19 07:56:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
we've done that so far. so i guess yeah.
2006-09-19 07:19:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by lady sixx 6
·
0⤊
0⤋