I personally think there would be wars, and you might disagree, but there certainly wouldn't be any bridges or tall buildings or planes, either.
we'd stilll be foraging in the woods.
2006-09-19 03:36:04 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
Women are catty. there would definatly be more wars. but what is with the still foraging in the woods crap? If you havent noticed women are also very good at manipulating a guy to do the work for them
2006-09-19 04:09:24 · answer #1 · answered by Pixie Dust 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You think "we would still be foraging in the woods"! LOL Women run households, manage business's, are politicians, leaders, ect. I think that if it weren't for women, men would still live like cavemen, and I know many women who agree on that. As far as their being no wars, I believe their would be. But I have to disagree with you on the rest. Women are very good at planning, organizing, and getting things done. We design, build and create! I think your statement stands to show that your thinking is one of a caveman. Get with it, it's 2006, not 1906!
2006-09-19 03:49:04 · answer #2 · answered by kandekizzez 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Look at how women deal with each others. I tend to think that if women ruled the world there would be MORE wars, and they would be because Queen so-and-so called Queen so-and-so a b****. Girls let emotions overtake them too much. Now, on the other hand, men act too often in haste! A mix of using feelings at the right time and remaining objective are needed to rule this world. This requires both men and women in leadership. Let's work together, lol!!!
2006-09-19 03:42:02 · answer #3 · answered by +TheEndIsInSight+ 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Ha Ha Ha you are so funny little man. If men were really in charge we would still be living in filthy caves. Puleeeeeez. Everyone knows that behind every great man there is a woman pushing him out from in front of the tv and telling him to go and DO something.
2006-09-19 03:41:50 · answer #4 · answered by dragonrider707 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
THERE WOULD BE NO WARS. With six daughters I am confident that the women would have us so busy all the time fixing things and working that there would be no time for a relaxing war or anything.
2006-09-19 03:40:20 · answer #5 · answered by acmeraven 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the world would be a much more peaceful place. I think war would be only as a last resort and there would be no need for weapons of mass destruction.
2006-09-19 03:42:42 · answer #6 · answered by emilypost 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think that if women ruled the world that there would be wars. Think about it, once a month we get grumpier than he*ll and sooner or later we'd take it out on another country. lol.
2006-09-19 03:42:53 · answer #7 · answered by GirlinNB 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
are you crazy if women ruled there would be a lot more wars than now but the wars would probably over stupied things
2006-09-19 03:51:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
men, women, makes no difference who has the power. what matters is intelligence and respect for others. if every world leader male or female had those two things then maybe there'd be no war.
2006-09-19 03:46:25 · answer #9 · answered by hey_finny 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
if women ruled the world thered be tons of wars. id be worried if a woman got voted for president. i think that a man is better suited for the job.
2006-09-19 03:39:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋