English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-19 02:49:20 · 10 answers · asked by Lamvelase111 1 in Politics & Government Civic Participation

10 answers

sure why not? they want to produce nuclear power to generate energy. Almost all countries around the globe have nuclear power and that doesn't mean they are developing an atomic bomb.
Besides, no country has opposed to The US nuclear power genetors even when America has been the only country that has already dropped 2 bombs in Japan

2006-09-19 03:08:17 · answer #1 · answered by me 6 · 0 2

this is the deal. The USA does not decide. Iran has oil wealth, they starve people to get it. Russia has 22,000 nukes. Iran could buy anything they want. The question is does Iran have a good reason to buy nukes? Will it be GW Bush who gives them that reason? Iran now controls much of Iraq and Afghanistan is falling fast to the back to the Taliban control and the opium crop is up 60 percent there. Bush has said he will not meet with Iran and I am sure that invasion is in the works now. Bush just drafted another 35,000.

2006-09-19 04:09:46 · answer #2 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 0 2

Most definately not they are a primitive culture and they are a very angry culture right now. And if you want Isreal to go away then by all means give them the pursuit to the nuclear issue. They were on the news this am talking against Isreal. Isreal is not the united states they are not as passive as the united states has been on issues. Isreal will retaliate against ppl starting wars with them. So I guess my answer is definately no !!!!!!No!!!!!No!!!!!

2006-09-19 03:26:38 · answer #3 · answered by Kate T. 7 · 2 2

Should Americans feel they have the right to make that decision? When do we stop being the bullies of the world?

2006-09-22 14:24:59 · answer #4 · answered by heyrobo 6 · 0 0

I understand the reasons why not with the threats that have been made against Israel, but I think let them develop them. No reason then not to take 'em out if they start getting more vicious.

2006-09-19 02:58:16 · answer #5 · answered by rebecca z 2 · 0 2

NO!
Gad, why give that much power to an uncontrolled angry people?
If you want the rest of the world to go away, then yes, but being rational, I would say again, NO!

2006-09-19 02:58:51 · answer #6 · answered by fairly smart 7 · 1 2

The simple answer is a loud and firm NO.

2006-09-19 02:57:28 · answer #7 · answered by looking good 3 · 2 1

It would not be democratic to not let them.

2006-09-20 06:09:13 · answer #8 · answered by brzrxor 2 · 0 0

no. we need to pay an insider to blow it up and make it appear they had a huge accident. PERIOD

2006-09-19 02:56:58 · answer #9 · answered by hopkinsezy 2 · 3 1

Hell yeah.
Was Israel stopped in anyway?

2006-09-19 03:43:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers