Does GOD and SCIENCE explain two parts of the same "coin"?

Question

For example: (spiritually) God spoke creation into existance--( the natural explanation) The Big bang created the universe... Furthermore (spiritually) God created the world in 7 days--(natural explanation) evolution... Near death experience(white light)-- (natural explanation) brain is losing oxygen. I believe that everything can be explained both naturally (science) but also supernaturaly (God).comments>

Answer 1

I agree with you. I know that Science explains most of the stuff in our universe. But I also believe that God made all of that stuff. The human body is too complex to not prove the existence of a higher being. I believe that God and Science do co-exist. I am glad that I am not the only person that feels this way. LIfe is amazing and it is miraculous that our bodies work the way that they do.
Thank you!

Answer 2

It CAN be explained supernaturally, yes. However, those explanations are almost always (if not always) less logical than the scientific ones.

Consider this scenario: I walk out my front door and see a car on the side of the street. I think of two possible explanations for it being there:
1. Someone parked it there.
2. A flying saucer beamed it down there.
They are both POSSIBLE, but the first is obviously much more likely. It's the same thing with science and God; the scientific explanations are logically more likely than the supernatural explanations.

Answer 3

"Either/OR" is a classic logical fallacy. To state that something either must be one thing, or it is another, ignores a lot of possibilities.

So, let's look at it this way.

God is supposed to be all-knowing and all-powerful. He's also mysterious. The hard part about God in science is that he's also intelligent.

So, how can you prove or disprove the existence of God with scientific method? You need to create a set of controls, one WITH the presence of God, and the other without. I don't think you can do that without prayer.

There's no way to prove God didn't get into your system of analysis and so it's impossible to prove God does not exist. It's purely a matter of faith and even if science offers a proof, for reasons I've mentioned you can neither include nor exclude God from science.

So, in essence I agree with you.

Answer 4

I disagree, why do we need to add to the big bang theory with a fairy tale about a god speaking? Why not talk about the earth springing out of the forehead of a titan? Or a serpent's egg hatching and becoming the earth?
If the earth and life were formed over 4.5 billion years, what possible good does it do to talk about it in terms of a 7 day task undertaken by a man in the sky? Especially when it gets things out of order?
If we see that near death experiences can be duplicated again and again by pilots suffering black-outs, doesn't that completely undermine the whole idea that they are witnessing some afterlife? Especially if every pilot, whether xian or not experiences the same thing?

Answer 5

That is correct. there is not much difference in the the two theories except that one says it was an accident and the other says it was done by a intelligent being.
Science was made by man to try and explain the how it was done rather than the why.
whither or not it was by intelligent design is a matter of faith.
Either way we are stuck with what we have as we cannot make something from nothing . but can only rearrange what is here into something to fit our needs.

Answer 6

NOPE!!

GOD & SCIENCE are explain two railway tracks that never will meet each other.

The Hindus have seen their marble god Ganesh drink milk by the gallon. The Catholics have seen the statue of Virgin Mary cry tears of blood .

To those miracle happen in front of thousand and thousand of people. So you can make sure thoese are not set up or lie.

I just wanna ask you one question Do you have any scientific explanation for that?

Answer 7

No. Religion makes claims on the Universe without limited knowledge. Remember most of these beliefs are ancient in origin. Without the knowledge of science, they had no way of deducing the truth.

But today, with Science, we have begun to discover a much more grander and awesome scope of life in the Universe. Something I discovered early on in my life. That what I was taught in Sunday School couldn't even touch the things we learn from Science and Astronomy.

Answer 8

No, there always comes a point at which the two views are contradictory. Science cannot accept taking something just because (as believers take the existence of a god) and religions cannot accept discussing the existence of god, which religions will do, if necessary.

Answer 9

Nice try of trying to match them but they are not right. The science side has been proven but the religious side has not. Unless some spiritual entity appears infront of us and confirms this, I don't think we are looking at the same coin here.

Off topic.

Sometime I find it a little amusing that when brought up the word god, the christian would say that its their god.

Answer 10

You can't come to an honest and logical conclusion if you got into a classroom with the intentions of coming out with any fragment of truth that will support your unreasonable beliefs. Evolution should stand for what it is; the facts that have been and no more. Trying the squeeze in the story of Creation is against science itself. Science is the search for truth, religion is the search for what is comforting.