2006-09-18 11:40:28 · 10 answers · asked by sue e 2 in Education & Reference ➔ Quotations
16 is not equal to 64
2006-09-18 11:42:18 · answer #1 · answered by Will 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not sure what has happened here, a typo of some sort I assume. Because the first equality is false. 4x4(4)=64, but I don't think that's what you want.
2006-09-18 18:42:56 · answer #2 · answered by juicy_wishun 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
False
4X4 = 16
4X4(4) = 64
2006-09-18 18:42:18 · answer #3 · answered by dryheatdave 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is a question about mathematics, so it belongs in the mathematics section not the "quotations" section.
2006-09-18 18:43:50 · answer #4 · answered by My Evil Twin 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is one of my favorite quotations, but it's so obscure most people never hear of it. Where did you find it? Do you understand its literary, sociological, and artistic implications?
2006-09-18 18:49:07 · answer #5 · answered by Ever Learn 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
hmmmmm nope!
2006-09-18 19:27:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
booger.
2006-09-18 19:03:53 · answer #7 · answered by ß Pwned ß 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no
2006-09-18 18:41:49 · answer #8 · answered by Tom 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
='s "I don't think so"
2006-09-18 18:42:25 · answer #9 · answered by Tones 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
4*4=16=4*4=16*4=64
Or I dunno?
2006-09-18 18:44:57 · answer #10 · answered by Khat 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋