2006-09-18 11:04:20 · 34 answers · asked by Queue256 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
That is impossible. "Empirical" being the key. There is no way to provide legitamate empirical evidence for something that cannot be quantitated, measured, or experimented with in a lab with repeatable results.
Simply put, God isn't falsifiable. God isn't scientific. So keep God out of science.
2006-09-18 11:12:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Faith. But can anyone believe a molecue just popped out of nowhere a few million years ago and everything we see today came from that one molecue. Don't tell me the molecues or gases were always around because that goes against every scientific principle known to man. How did everything begin? Where did that very first molecue come from? It is impossible to explain, just as you believe it is impossible to explain the existence of God. At least people of Faith have an answer that satisfies their minds and their reason for existence.. I won't try to convince anyone here that God exisited but you can't prove He doesn't exist anymore than you can provide me with a single legitimate piece of empirical evidence for the creation of the very first molecue that started the world and developed into what we see today.
2006-09-18 11:13:04 · answer #2 · answered by Pop D 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Your good judgment is improper. the respond on your question is that theists can no longer tutor there's a god, and neither can atheists tutor there is not any longer. That mentioned, the information for all theist religions being invented with the aid of guy is compelling. on a similar time as this has little to do with proving the existence or non-existence of a ultimate being of a few variety, it easily makes one no longer likely, and the possibility of a god as postulated with the aid of Christianity, Judaism or Islam, etc. very almost vanishingly distant. Ocham's Razor might for this reason favour the placement that a theist god would not exist (yet, admittedly, would not tutor it)
2016-10-15 03:36:39 · answer #3 · answered by mcfee 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
redeye has you on that one. If you want scientific proof of God, that is impossible, because there is no such thing as scientific proof of anything. There is only scientific disproof. You can see this is true of the scientific method as it has appeared in our court system, innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Meaning, you cannot claim guilt until you can show all evidence against innocence (sp?). You cannot claim God is not unless you can prove God is not, and we cannot claim God is fact based on one thing, we must disprove all other possibilities. But, you will let your opinion keep you from believing disproof of all other possibilituies. YOu will probably hold on to those ideas as truth no matter how unlikely they are.
2006-09-18 11:11:36 · answer #4 · answered by Steve M 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NO
no one can, no one has ever been able to, no one will ever be able to.
Faith doesn't require evidence, fact, demonstrability, rational thought, etc etc etc
You can chose to believe or not...but there is NO proof
which explains the existence of Agnostics and Atheists
Theists, Deists, "humanists" etc etc etc
all make a priori assumptions to justify their belief systems....specious reasoning, a posteori "logic", intuitive and antedoctal evidence....
nope, that philosophical dog just don't hunt....
and theology is the consideration of what a godhead might/could/should/ought to be
2006-09-18 11:15:55 · answer #5 · answered by Gemelli2 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hello. I am a legitimate piece of empirical evidence of the existence of God. Have a great day.
2006-09-18 11:11:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Hello Sir - I'd say that you are a legitimate piece of empirical evidence for the existence of God. How else were you created? After thoroughly evaluating the arguments against God, I have come to the conclusion that it takes more faith be an atheist, than it does to believe in God. I pray you realize that God created the world (cosmological argument); He created mankind in all its details (teleological argument), and He gave us a conscience that discerns between good and evil (moral argument). God Bless you.
2006-09-18 11:11:04 · answer #7 · answered by pastor 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Jesus was born a virgin,died on a cross for your and my sins, ,but arose on the 3rd day. was on earth some 40 days and was seen by over 500 people before he ascended to heaven and he still lives today some 2,000 years later. Its all about faith. You cannot give me any evidence that proves there is no God.
2006-09-18 11:17:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Can you provide me with a single legitimate piece of empirical evidence that he doesn't exist?
2006-09-18 11:07:01 · answer #9 · answered by redeye.treefrog 3 · 6⤊ 3⤋
What would you consider legitimate empirical evidence? In my present view, those evidences are all around us.
2006-09-18 11:33:57 · answer #10 · answered by jefferyspringer57@sbcglobal.net 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋