English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

18 answers

Yes

2006-09-18 08:16:03 · answer #1 · answered by PaganPoetess 5 · 2 0

All wars in General, why just Religious.

Although all if this is about belief systems.

There are some people in this world that think Hilter was terribly misunderstood. First, he was a GREAT dancer! And he had a Song in his Heart, as Mel Brooks, a Jew who just loves to put Hiter into movies, points out.

There are some people who think Hitler should have won!

I mean it was about a point of view. Hitler's religion believed that Blonde Blue Eyes people should only be with others. You know LIKE should be with LIKE.

Hitler, like the Muslims, felt the only good Jew was a Dead Jew.

Of course a lot of Christians Felt that way too.

After all, the Jews killed Christ!

But, still we followed our Great God Roosevelt, a man married to his first cousin, who was an obvious communist sympathizer, into a war with Hitler and nice Italian boy Musslini and the Japanese who make such bloody good Cameras, TV sets and Cars!

That was a war over beliefs!

The Japanese wanted us out of the Pacific Ocean Island, the Muslims want us out of Iraq

There's not much difference.

We don't belong there. We don't look like them

Like should be with like

But yes,

We follow our Roosevelts, Pattons, Trumans, Eisenhowers, Kennedys, Johnsons and Bushes blindly into war.

Those are our religious leaders.

I mean, only a few people are blowing up abortion clinics, no one is Following Pat Roberstsons lead to get rid of the queers. Most of the country opposes the KKK (A religious orgnaization) view to get ride of the Colored Folk, Queers, Jews, Heathen Indians and Swaddeling Spicks.

When was the last time you saw the world pick up and go off on a crudase as commnaded by a Pope or Minister? 500, 600, 700 years ago?

Religion has opposed Korea, Vietnam, Greneda, Kwuait and now Iraq.

We obviously chose to ignore them in favor of our more religous leaders like Bush and Blair.

The best team since Reagan and his dancing partner Margarette Thatcher.

And remember, if you beat hot metals in a fire then they called you Smith

And if you lived in a City they called your Burger

And if you made people sick to their stomaches they called you Thatcher!

2006-09-18 08:30:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Yes. So called religious wars are always about land and power and done in the favour of various leaders.

2006-09-18 08:16:50 · answer #3 · answered by jasminelilia 5 · 2 0

Well, that's a complicated question.
Sometimes man's motive to go to war is deceptive - like for oil or to gain political power and / or land.
However - at the end of the day - GOD is in control of everything that happens and He either allows something to happen, or He doesn't allow it to happen. Sometimes God will allow a war because He knows the purpose it wil lserve in the grand scheme of things and allows politicians to think that they're getting away with something but in reality He sees everything and has a reason for allowing all that happens under the sun.

2006-09-18 08:18:25 · answer #4 · answered by tatjana 2 · 0 1

traditionally, faith is a sort of field for a series of practices that help remembrance. Spirituality, loosely stated, is the be attentive to-how that there is purely ever this 2d in organic expertise - no longer something to undergo in techniques. religious sort of folk could or will possibly no longer believe besides to this contemporary 2d and organic expertise as their source. religious human beings tend extra to comprehend that there is not any center of expertise and that the source of all of it is nameless or maybe generally beside the factor. completely religious human beings tend to have purely a conceptual and nostalgic be attentive to-how of a few merchandise of remembrance. completely religious human beings believe in some center of outstanding source located outdoors of their physique. in all probability secure to declare that few, if any, are a hundred% the two intense right here. finally the two one among your alternatives are transcended in so-called dying. the two are a similar interior the sense that the two, simply by fact the suggestions proposed right here, are interior expertise completely and because it is so, they could tend to bare the knots of expertise – despite if it is God or anatman or chocolate. ;) someone can pass from one to the different and back back over a life-time until dying - despite if by awakening or end of physique - whilst it extremely isn't any longer likely that any previous state could be revisited.

2016-10-17 05:29:07 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

i think religion is a tool political leaders use to sway popular opinion into favoring a war.

2006-09-18 08:16:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I think what wars were fought over religion (the protestant - catholic wars, and the crusader - infidel wars) were fought over differences, if it hadn't been faith or belief, or even the leaders, it would be something else.. even hair color.. whatever.. take away all differences, we'd still have wars, unless human nature is changed.. I think there's lots of things that get repeated over and over which are not true but repeated so often, most think they are.. Most wars were wars of conquest.. And all peoples and races are guilty, but human nature wants to have scapegoats.. over, and over and over.. we never learn.

2006-09-18 08:21:26 · answer #7 · answered by flowerchilde 2 · 0 1

About time somebody points it out. Yes is the answer. And the Atheist will be here in 3....2.....1...

2006-09-18 08:16:01 · answer #8 · answered by ReliableLogic 5 · 2 0

I think wars are fought for economic or political reasons and then later religion is dragged into it.

2006-09-18 08:16:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

There are no gods. Therefore it was just religious leaders with gullible "sheep".

2006-09-18 08:17:28 · answer #10 · answered by nondescript 7 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers