There's your mistakes, and there's your deliberate negligence. What's REALLY going on, here? Hmmm....
2006-09-18 04:56:25 · 10 answers · asked by gokart121 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
Maybe, for some it could be an integration issue. We have always had those. But, there really is an immigration issue as well. I think it needs to be handled matter of factly, with good sense, according to how much our economy can really handle, for the good of those we already have here, to take care of. It has to stop somewhere. That's just fact. While I understand people wanting to have a better life for themselves, and acknowledge that is how America has been populated for hundreds of years, it has become an obvious problem because of people doing it illegally. Let's deal with one thing, then we can deal with the other.
2006-09-18 05:14:22 · answer #1 · answered by catarina 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A WHORE A.K.A PRINCESS 29 71 WROTE THIS ABOUT MEXICANS
Ode to illegal Mexicans
My best friend and I thought we would write something meaningful about the illegal Mexicans in this country. If you don't have a sense of humor, don't read it. I think it's hilarious and we had a lot of fun doing this. In case any did not Get It, I am being sarcastic when I say "meaningful". I found a lovely picture of some "steaming" Brown Pride.
BROWN PRIDE
Maria has 15 little beaners
because Jose won't put a condom on his little weiner.
La Cucaracha is their national song
singing about themselves all day long...
The buzzard rag waves in their front yard,
but they won't leave America....******* retards!
Viva la raza is what they say
We know beaners are totally gay.
What is that I see in Jose's truck?
Looks like curtains but ugly as ****.
Mexican women think they are true divas....
funny thing is they are all named Maria!
Jose's at the flea market, picking his nose.
Buying Maria more maternity clothes.
Beaners love fat women with bleach blonde hair.
That one Jesus has....rolls everywhere!!!
Carnival music plays on the night air....
Preparing foreplay for beanbags everywhere.
2006-09-20 10:49:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
it is going to grow to be a boiling ingredient via actuality human beings, even in all risk you, get all bent out of shape over immigration. I agree that each man or woman immigration would desire to be for the size of the front door. yet like it or not, the Southwest belonged to Mexicans previously it grew to grow to be into annexed by potential of potential of the U. S.. i don't think of of it ought to remember if Africa have been south persons quite of Mexico. If race have been a controversy, African human beings would have been lower back to Africa already. it is exactly what white supremacists want if it have been as much as them. They dream of the day at the same time as united statesa. is free of blacks. American Indians dream of the day at the same time as united statesa. is free of the white guy. targets, although, are easily not actuality. united statesa. is a land of immigrants, each man or woman persons. Even the Indians migrated suited right here for the size of the Bering Strait from Asia some 10,000 years interior the previous. Immigrants in seek for of jobs and bigger powerful danger isn't a danger to united statesa.. in the event that they adjust into voters and function an inclination to vote Democratic, then they seem a political danger to Republicans. Any talk of terrorism is in elementary words a diversion and a smoke instruct by potential of potential of the employer who needs to stay in potential.
2016-12-18 12:28:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mistake vs negligence? Those are the choices of judgement you have to offer?
You're right to this degree. If one wants to speculate on past events, we could have prevented the current turmoil long ago by cracking down on the people coming over the border, and the Americans who employed them. But, why do I get the sense that they would have been just as angry, and would have expressed the same sense of ill-usage about it then as they do now?
What's really going on is that we share 2000 mile borders with 2 countries. One country's people permit terrible government, and so, many of said people use our country as an escape route from said terrible government. The other country is fine, thank you very much, and doesn't feel inclined to slip into the US illegally en masse.
How happy would illegal immigrants be if we had refused to employ them right from the start, refused to allow them access to education, food, housing, health care, and ran them out of town on a rail as soon as we found out they were here? Would they have admired and respected us for our actions? At the time, with work needing to be done and willing hands to do it, would we have been better off ethically or morally for having turned our backs? Does the fact that we benefitted as well mean we're more responsible than the people on the other side of the equation?
See, what you have here is a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation. What I'm hearing is, we are obligated to provide all of the above, plus citizenship, because our borders march alongside Mexico's and we haven't decisively repelled them in the past. If we had, we would have been labelled greedy, inhumane monsters who refused to help out our poorer neighbors. Because we had a don't ask, don't tell relationship instead, we are labelled greedy, inhumane monsters who refuse to help out our poorer neighbors.
You no doubt are convinced I'm a racist at this point, but I don't have any problem with immigration. I don't have a problem with offering legal immigrant status to Mexicans, or any other nationality. But, I absolutely oppose the idea that illegal workers are entitled to jump the line, and that their illegal presence in this country entitles them to do anything other than apply for US citizenship like any other person seeking to emigrate here.
I have a friend in my workplace, who came here from India several years ago, legally. He has been working ever since he got here, and has applied for visas for the rest of his family to join him. He's been waiting for nearly seven years now. Every month, I log into the National Visa Center's site while he peers anxiously over my shoulder, so he can see the monthly visa bulletin, and see how close they are getting to processing his family's petition for visas. I don't support ANYONE's claim that they have a right to cut ahead of his family's place in line. He has done everything he was legally supposed to do to get himself and his family here, he is an asset to our workplace, and he is now an old man. If 11 million illegal workers get to lay claim to the federal government's time in order to get their visa requests processed on the fast track, my friend will never get to live his own long-awaited American dream. I can't and won't support such an injustice.
2006-09-18 07:44:06 · answer #4 · answered by functionary01 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, the issue is about immigration. Integration is a different subject.
2006-09-18 05:12:45 · answer #5 · answered by yahoohoo 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
you can only be integrated after you become legal.For full integration you will need to be eligible for all services americans are.I do think you have integration issue,however your immigration issue have to do more with legalization
2006-09-18 05:00:08 · answer #6 · answered by RX 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your added remarks sounds like you are already building up a charge of hate for some respondents.
2006-09-18 05:04:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Interesting point.
2006-09-18 04:57:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What happened to the word Illegal in that statement?
2006-09-18 05:12:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
no. if you are illegial you are not intergrated into society.
2006-09-18 05:49:21 · answer #10 · answered by scififed 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋