do you feel the pope has anything to apologize for? should he have been more sensitive about his comments?

Question

his use of words from the past (the 14th century) has inflamed muslims worldwide. now pope benedict has apologized for the way his words were interpreted. was an apology necessary? do you think it was sincere, or meant to quiet any further backlash against catholics (and christians) worldwide?

furthermore, was pope benedict insensitive? should he have expected this type of response from the followers of islam? what do you think?

Answer 1

The pope has apologized twice although I do not think that the pope needed to apologize. What he said brought the issue of religious conquest to the forefront. There are three different Muslim factions that seek to establish a regional/global Islamic khalifah so the remarks are timely.

He did not mistate fact. There is no way to control how a person reacts to information. It is hardly possible to anticipate what impact a speech or book may have. Pope Benedict was not insensitive, in my opinion.

On Tuesday, September 12th, Pope Benedict XVI made a speech on "Faith and Reason" at the University of Regensburg in Germany and quoted from writings of an erudite 14th Century Byzantine Christian Emperor, Manuel II Palaiologos. Manuel II took notes during his dialogs in 1391 with the Persian Muderris at Ankara and his notebooks were preserved as the "Twenty-six Dialogs with a Persian" on the "truths of Christianity and Islam". The pontiff quoted Manuel II who said that spreading the faith through violence is unreasonable and that acting without reason was against God's nature.

Manuel II's empire had been conquerored by Muslims and was made to pay the jizyah (submission tribute) so naturally he experienced Islam at its worst. Between 1379 and 1402 Byzantium had paid 690,000 hyperpyra (or 345,000 ducats) to the Ottomans.
http://www.roman-emperors.org/manuel2.htm

The pontiff said, "Speaking about the issue of jihad, holy war, the emperor [Manuel II] said, 'Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.'"

"Violence is incompatible with the nature of God and the nature of the soul," added the pontiff in his own words.
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2006/september/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20060912_university-regensburg_en.html
http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=46474

Muslim reaction to that speech spanned from outrage to violence against nuns and churches. An Iraqi insurgent group threatened the Vatican with a suicide attack over the pope's remarks on Islam, according to a statement posted Saturday on the Web.

"We swear to God to send you people who adore death as much as you adore life," said the message posted in the name of the Mujahedeen Army on a Web site frequently used by militant groups. The message's authenticity could not be independently verified. The statement was addressed to "you dog of Rome" and threatens to "shake your thrones and break your crosses in your home."

Full statement by Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone on Pope Benedict XVI's response to Muslim anger over a speech he gave in Germany Tuesday... the pontiff was "very sorry" if he offended the sensibilities of Muslims worldwide.
http://www.islamonline.net/English/News/2006-09/16/05a.shtml

On Sunday, September 17th the pontiff said, " I am deeply sorry for the reactions in some countries to a few passages of my address at the University of Regensburg, which were considered offensive to the sensibility of Muslims."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5353774.stm

Pope Benedict has the right to speak, he can certainly quote from the Bible and he can quote former Popes. His "apology" that he regrets Muslims became upset is appropriate because Muslims are always offended and humiliated whenever anything is said about Islam that is unflattering.

Pope Benedict made the comments in a speech at the University of Regensburg which was probably a written speech and his remarks were probably carefully researched and edited. In my opinion, the quote was appropriate for the times of the Crusades. The quote also seems applicable to Islamic jihhadists today.

Of course Muslims are outraged. It is a tenet of Islam that any time the religion is attacked that all Muslims have a duty to defend it. Violence gets attention. The timing of the speech is just before Ramadan. (Dates for Ramadan 2006 (or the Islamic year of 1427) are September 24th thru October 23rd.)

I wonder what level of protection the Swiss guards at the Vatican provide? What kind of weapons do they have?

Some contemporary evangelical Christian leaders such as Jerry Falwell and Jerry Vines have called Muhammad "a terrorist" and a "demon possessed pedophile who had twelve wives". Daniel Pipes sees Muhammad as a politician, stating that "because Muhammad created a new community, the religion that was its raison d'etre had to meet the political needs of its adherents." By contrast, Pope Benedict quoting Manual II is quite mild.

Here is what Robbie Burns wrote and I think it can also be applied to jihaddists of today although it was written for Christians:
"On Thanksgiving For A National Victory"
Ye hypocrites are these your pranks
to murder men and give God thanks?
Desist, for shame proceed no further
God does ne want your thanks for murder.

Yah, I know, there is no compulsion in religion (2:256) and Islam is a peaceful religion. Taqiyah.

The one page essay by Dr. Walid Phares, "Islamic concept of Al-Taqiyah to infiltrate and destroy kafir countries" explains how a convert will become a terrorist:
http://www.fisiusa.org/fisi_News_items/news109.htm

Phares states, "It [taqiyah] is done to prevent the new converts from seeing the real face of Islam; at least until their faith or mental conditioning is strong enough to make them turn against their own country and people."

Not all Muslims blow up things, yet "jihad in the cause of Allah" "jihad fee sybil Allah" is "fard ayn" "compulsory duty" for all Muslims. Why? There are rules from the Quran for combattive jihad. Read this:
http://www.notislam.com/id8.html
What does the tape from Gadahn mean? Does anyone realize that Muslims are supposed to "dawa" "invite others to Islam" before jihad?

According to al-Mawardi an 11th Century Shafi'i jurist:

The mushrikun [infidels] of Dar al-Harb (the arena of battle) are of two types: First, those whom the call of Islam has reached, but they have refused it and have taken up arms.… Second, those whom the invitation to Islam has not reached, although such persons are few nowadays since Allah has made manifest the call of his Messenger…it is forbidden to…begin an attack before explaining the invitation to Islam to them, informing them of the miracles of the Prophet and making plain the proofs so as to encourage acceptance on their part; if they still refuse to accept after this, war is waged against them and they are treated as those whom the call has reached…

In the Hidayah, vol. II. p. 140 (Hanafi school):
It is not lawful to make war upon any people who have never before been called to the faith, without previously requiring them to embrace it, because the Prophet so instructed his commanders, directing them to call the infidels to the faith, and also because the people will hence perceive that they are attacked for the sake of religion, and not for the sake of taking their property, or making slaves of their children, and on this consideration it is possible that they may be induced to agree to the call, in order to save themselves from the troubles of war… If the infidels, upon receiving the call, neither consent to it nor agree to pay capitation tax, it is then incumbent on the Muslims to call upon God for assistance, and to make war upon them, because God is the assistant of those who serve Him, and the destroyer of His enemies, the infidels, and it is necessary to implore His aid upon every occasion; the Prophet, moreover, commands us so to do."

Islam is insidious, it encroaches on a culture slowly and deliberately. Here is a document which discusses the progression of Islam in great detail (50+ pages) -- "From dawa to jihad - the various threats from radical Islam to the democratic legal order":
http://www.fas.org/irp/world/netherlands/dawa.pdf

Among Muslims there are those who:
a) jihad in the path of Allah with their wealth and their lives (including those who sit at home but give asylum to mujahidin 4:74) = true Muslim
b) those who sit at home (and do not give asylum to mujahidin or jihad in the path of Allah)
c) the handicapped (does not count as a category)

According to the Qur'an who is a true believer?

3:140 If you have sustained a wound, _ (a blow in the battlefield) _ others too have suffered a similar kind of wound, earlier. These are the vicissitudes of life that We circulate among mankind by turns. Thus, Allah tests the true believers among you, so He may pick the martyrs among you. Allah does not like the wrongdoers.

4:95 The two are not equal: those who sit at home (and do not join the fighting) _ unless they have a reason; they are handicapped _ and those who [jihad] strive hard in the path of Allah with their wealth and lives. Over those who sit at home, Allah has excelled and elevated to a higher honor those who strive hard with their wealth and lives.
Compared to those who sit at home, Allah will award a far greater reward to those who wage a struggle.

8:74 Those who believed, left their homes and waged a struggle for the cause of Allah as well as those who helped and protected them are really the true believers. There is forgiveness for them and a generous rewards.

49:15 The (true) believers are actually those who believe in Allah and His messenger and then do not waver (and do not entertain doubts). With their wealth and their lives, they strive for the sake of Allah. Such are truly the sincere ones

9:86 As soon as a chapter (of the Qur’an) is revealed (instructing them), “Believe in Allah and wage a struggle along with His messenger” the able bodied (and well to do) among them ask to be exempted. They say, “Leave us (behind). Let us be among those who sit at home

Killing (qitl) and jihad in the cause of Allah is the hallmark of true Muslim believers. It is not a matter of moderate or fanatic. It is the distinction of a true believer or a rebel.

4:76 Those who believe, do fight for the sake of Allah, while those who reject faith (Islam) fight for the cause of ‘taghut’ _ (all rebellious forces aligned against Allah). So, fight against the minions of Shaitan. Feeble indeed is the wily guile of Shaitan!

Does this include atomic weapons?
8:60 Acquire and prepare all the (military) strength you can muster, including the finest trained horses (and other military wares). With that, you would daunt and deter the enemies of Allah _ your enemies, and others besides them. You do not know them, but Allah (surely) knows them. Anything you spend in the path of Allah will be returned to you in full. You will not be wronged (at all).

2:216 Warfare (for the sake of Allah) has been ordained for you, though it is not something you like. It is possible that the thing you detest might just (turn out to) be good for you. It is possible that the thing you like (the most) might in reality be bad for you. Allah knows (all) while you know nothing (at all)!

4:74 Those who have traded away the life of this world for (the benefits of) the life-to-come, ought to fight for the sake of Allah. To anyone who fights for the sake of Allah, We will award the most generous reward whether he is killed (in the process) or comes out victorious.

These verses from the Qur'an can give us insight into the mind of a Muslim believer and the peaceful religion of Islam. Do read the entire sura from which they were extracted to get the entire context of the verses. It may make a difference.

Answer 2

If the shoe suits, placed on it. say sorry - why? it incredibly is the purely suitable hypocrisy. i presumed the pope grew to become into meant to be truthful. Jihad IS violent. Islamist enthusiasts will use any excuse to kill. here, your large brave righteous chief of the Catholic flock, backs down against an Islamic uproar. He could have further that the Danish cartoons have been humorous as hell, yet i assume it incredibly is purely too lots to anticipate from the Holy See. i'd provide him a holy C- for being this form of weenie. Jihadists choose us all lifeless no rely how lots the pope sucks as much as them, so why hardship to assuage them in any respect?

Answer 3

Not at all! I am Catholic myself. And first of all, I am sure he was quoting from this to make a point. Secondly, noone should be calling it an apology. It is a play on words. He is not sorry for what he said and why should he be? Thirdly, Catholics are Catholics because they believe in the Catholic doctrine. We wouldn't be Catholics if we didn't believe. If someone doesn't believe in the way they are raised, they always have the option to convert to another religion. It happens all the time. The Muslims are a rather silly people. The Pope is the ordained leader of the Catholic Church. What is he supposed to say? "The Muslim faith is a very good one and we should all convert."? We even have disagreements with the Greek Orthodox who we supposedly call our brothers in the faith.

Now, let's put the shoe on the other foot, so to speak. What if the Muslim Leader came forward and quoted, while in an address, some off the wall thing that the Catholic leaders said during the Catholic Crusades that justified killing thousands of people if they didn't side with the Catholic Church? And further yet, Catholics from all over the world were outraged by this Muslim leader quoting this and "causing devision among the people". So, many Catholic extremists in places like Ireland and Canada and parts of the US and England started blowing up Mosques and shooting "compasionate Imams" just to make a point. These silly little Muslims are so contradictory. What more could you expect from them? Would the Catholics be justified if we did that? And would it be OK if in reaction, the Pope or some other Catholic spokesperson on the subject was interviewed and said, "Well, we Catholics certainly don't condone what they are doing but I can certainly understand what has caused them to react this way. They really have no choice. And besides. I don't accept this Muslims leader's supposed apology because they wouldn't even be blowing up all these Mosques and killing all these Muslim men and women if he wouldn't have quoted that. He really should be more careful! If things were truly fair and we had the proper resources, we would take this Imam to court for quoting this stuff in our history that has no place in our world today. And he would be sent to jail." Oh yeah. Sure. Likely story! This would only happen in a Muslim country where you do not have freedom of speech. That rediculous Muslim leader that was interviewed said the most rediculous things! What is this world coming to? Boy! We must be very, very careful what we quote in our speeches these days or we might be responsible for someone else's death or another building being blown up. I think they've all been smoking too much of the opium they grow over there.

An yes, this IS a racist remark. So Yahoo can delete my answer but I DO believe I am freaking justified in feeling this way. :)

Answer 4

I read his original comments and I think he could have qualified them to some extent, but no, I don't think he should apologize for them, especially since certain people are going to a lot of trouble to prove him right.

The only problem I have with the Pope on this is that Christianity and Judaism have a long and bloody history of violence themselves.

Answer 5

no b/c he was quoting someone else who had said something bad about muslims. he even said later that what he meant was that there are violent religious radicals in every religion - even christian. i just think that muslims in other countries get all fired up when their name is mentioned and don't stop to think about the context of the words the pope used.

Answer 6

Honestly, if anyone had read the whole speech, the Pope had nothing to appologize for. He quoted that ancient text to show what intolerance was and went on to talk about living together.

Answer 7

I believe he poorly worded his intended point. I believe he meant to speak only of the subgroup of Islam who does practice violence in the name of religion. However, that was not very clear. So to say he was sorry that his words were misinterpreted seems the correct tact.

I believe he expected his purpose to be clearer than it was, but to even mention Islam and violence together, he should have expected some kind of reaction.

Answer 8

I don't think he thought his words would be publicized. This was a scholarly speech.

But, should he AS A CHRISTIAN apologize? That's a tough one. I think that he has a duty to speak honestly, but he also has a duty to unite people peacefully. That's every Christians duty. We must resist the desire to fight, even for our faith, because that appeals to an un-Christian side of us, ironically. I think he needs to say that he respects them as people, and that he respects their belief. But let's all get serious about this one point: I don't think that he thinks that Muhammed was a messenger of God. I can respect them and their belief, but I cannot accept their religion as correct.

Answer 9

I think God will use it for the good whatever happened in the past week.

Islam doesn't have Jesus as Lord and God. Monotheism yes but paying attention to Jesus's life example of peace and healing? A diminished Jesus and unbelief in the visible God and the obvious life example you are supposed to take to heart!

We must be as tolerant as possible of these people who are struggling because they have been told to reject the divinity of Jesus Christ.

Answer 10

As a Muslim I feel bored from this crap....We all know that the Catholics don't believe in Prophet Muhamed (pbuh) and we all know that he keeps in his heart more than what he said...At least he made the Muslims unite togeather on one word.

Answer 11

No people are to sensitive to these idiots. They should do the world a favor and bow themselves up in unison.
Tammi Dee