English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

Probably that they hadn't got enough evidence to convict somebody. That, or the thief is an informer to the police......or a friend of one of them!

2006-09-18 01:38:14 · answer #1 · answered by lou b 6 · 0 1

The answers you've been given all good ones. A similar thing happened to my wife and I.

If you know who the robber is take matters into your own hands! You might apply the Hammurabi's Code of Laws. Do be mindful what I suggest here is against modern law in most places. I've known of it being used. While there won't be any feelings of greatness from doing it, I know the next place this "robber" goes after will have to be wheelchair accessible.

2006-09-18 08:54:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

That means that either you declined to prosecute the robber or the Procecuting Attorney doesn't think there is enough evidence to prosecute the robber.

2006-09-18 08:39:06 · answer #3 · answered by RKC 3 · 1 0

That means the prosecutor didn't have enough evidence to follow through with a court case.

2006-09-18 08:37:46 · answer #4 · answered by mrscmmckim 7 · 0 0

I tend to agree not enough evidence to prosecute anyone

Too bad. I had to see criminals get away with it

2006-09-18 08:47:19 · answer #5 · answered by mjdp 4 · 0 0

It means there was a lack of evidence to pursue or allocate resources to your case. Unfortunately this is how many robberies end.

2006-09-18 08:38:17 · answer #6 · answered by Brandon L 2 · 0 0

it means that the prosecutor did not have enough evidence or did not feel that there was enough evidence

2006-09-18 09:25:00 · answer #7 · answered by cuda 1 · 0 0

lack of evidence misleading statements

2006-09-18 09:09:06 · answer #8 · answered by aldo 6 · 0 0

that means that u do not get that guy in jail

2006-09-18 08:59:25 · answer #9 · answered by jared_dl 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers