English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think it is in very bad taste. A fictionalized drama about the assassination of a "generic" president or even a caricature of Bush would be acceptable. But the movie is literally about killing our President, George W Bush.

No matter how much you hate the president (for whatever reason), whether you're a peacenik hippie or a border minuteman or a social security hawk, whatever your beef with the president may be, how could you possibly advocate, support, or be entertained by his execution?

This is just like when Ann Coulter made a tasteless joke about shooting Clinton. No one, not even her conservative base stood by her when she made such an asinine suggestion. To joke about killing the president is one thing, but to make an entire movie about it is downright traitorous. You might as well put on a filthy robe and start shouting "death to America".

Can't conservatives and liberals agree that such a premise is entirely opposed to the concepts of American law, justice, morality?

2006-09-18 01:13:11 · 9 answers · asked by askthepizzaguy 4 in Politics & Government Civic Participation

9 answers

It is tasteless, a shock film on assassination. Shame on them.
I thought going to that tasteless Micheal Moore film was
bad enough but to make & even consider encouraging killing our Commander in Chief goes to far.
I was not a President John F. Kennedy fan but would never wish for his death or watch a "film" of the death. It was hard enough to watch on news when it happened.
This is not entertainment - it is propoganda of the worst kind.

2006-09-18 03:59:07 · answer #1 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 0 0

I won't ever watch it. To depict the future assasination of an active President is in very poor taste. I hope that the liberal base in Hollywood uses good judgement and does not agree to show the movie in the United States.

2006-09-18 01:46:42 · answer #2 · answered by fire_side_2003 5 · 1 1

I think it should not be shown. It's nothing more than a cheap shot at the president by the democraps. As far as I'm concerned they can all go to hell in a hand basket.

2006-09-18 01:16:47 · answer #3 · answered by Justa_Honay_Guy 3 · 4 1

The people who made this are just trying to ruffle feathers and get recognition for their movie (I don't think they care if it's good or bad)
That way more people see the movie and they make more $$
It, like our government are trying to make $$

2006-09-18 01:22:57 · answer #4 · answered by GD-Fan 6 · 4 0

I am defintley not a Bush supporter but I wouldn't wish death on him. Not liking the decisons he has made doesn't constitute death. That's beyond extreme and I don't think it should be shown or released.

2006-09-18 01:19:50 · answer #5 · answered by sweetpea 3 · 1 3

Lets you know, who the adults are in Politics

2006-09-18 01:17:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Well, the director got what he wanted. Name and fame.

2006-09-18 10:38:30 · answer #7 · answered by Ajay 1 · 0 0

The faces of loss of existence series began somewhat until eventually now then that, yet have been nevertheless particularly familiar at that factor. Faces of loss of existence (1978) aka "the unique Faces of loss of existence" - u . s . (video field call) The Worst of Faces of loss of existence (1987) aka "Faces of loss of existence" Faces of loss of existence (2008) Titles (Partial fits) (exhibiting 17 outcomes) Faces of loss of existence II (1981) Faces of loss of existence IV (1990) Trancers II (1991) aka "Trancers II: the two Faces of loss of existence" Faces of loss of existence III (1985) Faces of loss of existence: fact or Fiction? (1999) Faces of loss of existence V (1995) (V) Faces of loss of existence VI (1996) (V) the better of Banned and loss of existence Faces (2001) (V) the various Faces of loss of existence, area 6 (1995) (V) Faces of loss of existence: The makeup outcomes of 'All Souls Day' (2006) (V) the various Faces of loss of existence, area 5 (1995) (V) the various Faces of loss of existence, area 7 (1995) (V) the various Faces of loss of existence, area 8 (1995) (V) the various Faces of loss of existence (1995) (V) the various Faces of loss of existence, area 3 (1995) (V) the various Faces of loss of existence, area 4 (1995) (V) the various Faces of loss of existence, area 2 (1995) (V)

2016-10-15 03:08:06 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

i think they should be locked up because its against the law to threaten the president

2006-09-18 01:22:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers