Doctrine has always been more important than common sense.
2006-09-17 23:26:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
A priest has to start as soon he has left the theological college, or after his vocation like all before him for hundreds of years.
Having been through all the SEX in their lives, though supposed to be CELIBATE, how can those that are higher up condemn the juniors?
History has kept on repeating itself, and will continue do to so. In the olden days the head of the local church was god, his word was law, no one could question his integrity and those who did so were burnt at the stake as heretics. Who would believe a child who had been abused and incur the wrath of the priest?
As the society moved from the middle ages to present day, people began believing their children and to fight for them, knowing well the priests had no special powers and they did not actually represent god, only gave guidance on the ways of the God, and thus approached the law.
NOW THE QUESTION, WHO WILL ADDRESS THIS PROBLEM, WHICH MEMBER OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, WHO IS CLEAN?
2006-09-18 06:35:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by ashok kumar 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
One misspelled word. It's celibacy, and it is NOT the cause of abuse by priests. Approx 95% of the abuse cases involve male victims, so the real word that you can hopefully spell correctly is homosexuality. It is deviant and it is morally wrong. The root causes that facilitated the abuse are (1) failures of seminaries to weed these offenders out early and (2) failures by Church bureaucracy to aggressively deal with those rightfully accused. If the issue was just celibacy, then there would be a much higher incidence of abuse of females. The offenders are gay and we're too politically correct in this country to offend the delicate sensibilities of gays by saying that they are deviant perverts.
2006-09-18 06:37:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by John 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
being gay isnt a perversion ... being a pedophile is... the two arent related.
john can blame god for his bigotry, i'm sure
"hey! .. god said it, not me..."
...yeah riiiiiiiiight
as to Why won't the Catholics address the *real* problem with priest sex scandals?" ... the church has been above the law for LONG time.
2006-09-18 07:46:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Denial
2006-09-18 06:26:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by SEOplanNOW.com 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
one thing pointing toward the beast power or antichrist is the fact that he won't have know a woman intimately;
Dan 11:37 Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all.
2006-09-18 06:28:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sky_blue 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
WHEN YOU SET YOUR SELF UP TO FAIL YOU ALWAYS WILL. UNDERSTAND THE ROME CHURCH WAS DOMED TO FAIL WHEN IT SET IT SELF UP TO RULE THE WORLD IN 3RD CENTURY. THEY WANTED TO KEEP PEOPLE IN THE DARK AGES SO THEY WOULD ALL WAYS BE SUPERIOR TO THE MASSES. YOU GOT TO REALLY WONDER WHAT HAPPENED BACK THEN WHEN ROME PRIEST WERE REALLY IN CONTROL OVER THE MASSES. i BELIEVE THAT WHEN YOU ASSUME THE TITLE OF holy FATHER, FATHER. YOU SET YOUR SELF UP AS A EQUALITY THE ONLY REAL FATHER WE HAVE. I PREACH AND TEACH THE WORD OF God BUT I AM NO ONES HOLY FATHER. i AM A CHILD OF GOD DOING WHAT GOD HAS TOLD ME TO DO MY HEAVEN FATHER SAYS THAT IF I DO HIS WORK HE WILL BE WITH ME HE DID NOT GIVE PERMISSION TO SUBSTITUTE FOR HIM IN MY BROTHERS EYES WHEN YOU CREATE YOUR OWN AGENDA GOD WILL ALWAYS FIND A WAY TO BRING IT DOWN. THUS THE ROME CHURCH AND IT.S SELF PROCLAIMED FATHERS ARE BEING BROUGHT DOWN, WHEN THEY REPENT AND ALLOW THE THE HOLY SPIRIT WORK INSIDE OF THEM THEY WILL AGAIN GET THE BLESSING OF MEN AND WOMEN WHO ARE TRUE CHILDREN OF GOD. I FOR ONE PRAY FOR THE ROME CHURCH AND ALL OF THEIR MISGUIDED ATTEMPT AT THE WORLD AND HOPE HEY WILL AGAIN SEEK GOD AND ONE PERSON AT A TIME MAY GOD HAVE MERCY ON THEIR SOULS AND ALL THE SOUL OF MAN KIND, THE BIBLE TELLS NOT TO CHANGE OR AMEND THE WORD OF GOD. AMEN.
2006-09-18 08:00:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mark B 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Brilliant observation! No, it isn't natural, and lets face it...can a man REALLY be celebate?
2006-09-18 06:26:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I don't know,but you are right
2006-09-18 06:26:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by evening_dewpoint 5
·
2⤊
1⤋