English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is it also true that white wedding dresses are hard to photograph? I also heard that light purple doesn't show up well but red is a good one. What about silver, gold, blues and greens?

2006-09-17 18:33:37 · 5 answers · asked by blueswan 2 in Arts & Humanities Visual Arts Photography

5 answers

I have trouble sometimes getting pink not to look washed out, and yes, if the wedding dress has detail in it, sometimes the rest of the picture is too dark, at least with digital. But, IMHO, the best colors for the subject to wear are blues, purples and greens, because they make a good contrast with skin tones. Anything too intense or shiny or patterned distracts from the subject.

2006-09-18 11:08:04 · answer #1 · answered by Teddie M 3 · 0 0

The principal objection that photographers have to certain colors is that they're difficult to expose for -- too bright or dark.

Of course, different film stocks (like Fuji NPH, Kodak Portra, Fuji Velvia, and Kodak Ektachrome) render colors differently, with certain films having noticeable deficiencies in rendering parts of the spectrum accurately. Naturally, film is falling out of favor among many professionals, so this isn't as much a factor as it once was. The biggest issue is exposure. Green vs. blue vs. purple or whatever is essentially moot. Digital photography, or even just digital processing of analog film, has made those concerns a thing of the past.

The key thing is that film (and digital sensors) can only handle so much contrast. In harsh light, the difference between a white wedding dress and a black tuxedo is enormous. It's easy for the dress to get "blown out" if the photographer isn't very careful with his exposure settings. This goes double for shiny things like jewelry. The difficulty is that if the photographer exposes the shot so as to get plenty of detail in the wedding dress, the bride's face will be underexposed, which in caucasians makes a person look unattractively red-faced, like a severe sunburn. Also, the groom's tuxedo will be completely black -- no detail at all. Shooting the bride and groom together requires careful lighting and an effort to find the best "compromise" exposure.

2006-09-17 19:26:09 · answer #2 · answered by Drew 6 · 1 0

Contrast can be achieved by use of complementary (not complimentary) colors. Film, which digital technology users hate to admit, has a much wider dynamic range than digital sensors. Through use of negative density filters, however, that can be easily overcome by the experienced professional. Or, through proper lighting techniques using fill-in light or perhaps from using diffusers to soften the light.

Film, on the average, has about 5-7 stops of leeway to work with insofar as the dynamic range afforded by film, whereas digital sensors can only work with 2, at the very most. Although the majority of professionals today are going over to the digital technology side, many still keep and use film cameras for difficlut situations.

The problem with silver (or metallic colors) is the reflections they can cause. The professional must find a way to eliminate or minimize or USE the reflection. That's why professionals say, "Knowledge is earning power!"

2006-09-17 19:44:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

one million) Have somebody take an incredible type of photos of you and discover your ultimate angles and ultimate lights. additionally attempt a variety of backgrounds. 2) discover out what hues and varieties seem stable on you. 3) discover out what makeup seems stable on you. 4) Be much less harsh on your self yet additionally be sensible once you seem interior the reflect. 5) bear in strategies that 'photos' in magazines are quite lots a digital portray and in all probability seem no longer something like the unique guy or woman lots of the time. in case you want your photos to look like that use Photoshop! 6) settle for those information: some human beings seem greater effective in guy or woman than in photos. some very photogenic human beings seem stable in photos and not-so-stable in guy or woman. human beings (maximum human beings in fact) seem regarding the comparable in %. as we do in actual existence. we are able to additionally do issues to make us seem greater effective the two on digital camera and interior the flesh. the foremost to finding stable the two way, is to be sure what brings out your ultimate constructive components and minimizes issues you do in comparison to.

2016-10-15 02:58:46 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Hi, perhaps you can also try google picasa.

picasa is a Google's photo software. It's what should've come with your camera.

It can Edit , organise and Share you picture and small video flips.

It's very easy to use and is free, just like Google

Download it free and just have a try:

http://www.bernanke.cn/google-picasa/

Good Luck!

2006-09-17 23:42:56 · answer #5 · answered by good.picasa 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers