Primary research involves things like letters and first hand accounts, i.e. a manuscript collection would be a primary source. A secondary source is something like a book written about the subject.
Ex.
A letter written to Churchill from FDR about the Yalta conference would be a primary source.
A book written about Churchill and FDR and their reactions to Yalta would be a secondary source.
2006-09-17 16:56:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Primary is the original research as secondary was the research after the first one which may have been more vital or more info
2006-09-17 16:36:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by sunflare63 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
enable's say you've been reading on Christopher Columbus. a first source is a first hand record. it will be something Columbus wrote himself. A secondary source might want to be someone writing about their experience with Columbus. (regular resources, in a lot of circumstances are extra sturdy to envision in my opinion) desire this facilitates. (:
2016-11-27 21:04:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Primary you conduct yourself (ask your classmates), secondary is conducted by others (usually like census statistics)
2006-09-17 16:34:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by fetchrat 3
·
0⤊
0⤋