in the long run will you really be happy with true love if you are struggling all the time financially????
2006-09-17 11:59:33 · 27 answers · asked by jennywren83177 1 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
for me he would have to be rich cause i'm not gay
2006-09-17 12:00:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, if your asking if I'd prefer a void in my heart or a void in my wallet, then I'll take the empty wallet anyday! If you really do love your partner, then finances shouldn't cause any more problems than anything else - even if things are tight, you can always cut back on non-essentials and live happily.
TBF, doing something you don't love for money for most of your life is what we generally refer to as a JOB, not a realationship - and you're technically talking about choosing love, or being a full time "escort service" - if it's for cash only, I don't care if it's only one guy, or a different guy every 2 hours, it's still prostitution.
Also, bear in mind how you felt the first time you shared a sunset with your first love. Now replace them with a huge pile of banknotes, and the feelings wouldn't be even close. You can't put a price on love, and you shouldn't ever try to.
2006-09-17 12:09:15 · answer #2 · answered by Purecheese 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Before I met my husband I would've said so so love with a rich guy. But now that i've had true love, I would say go for that. But only if the poor guy has ambition. Because if he doesn't, you'll lose respect for him quick and once you lose respect the love is over.
So basically, if the poor guy has enough potential so you too will at least one day be financially semi-comfortable, go for him. If not, learn to love the other guy!
2006-09-17 12:05:17 · answer #3 · answered by Rairia 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i sure as hell would be happy with true love. assuming that the poor man is loving me right, i would rather have his unconditional love making my hard time not so hard, instead of having all the money in the world, everything a woman could ask for in materialistic things, but being loved half-assed, conditionally, and not truly. Love is more valuable than any amount of money.
More importantly, the man has nothing to do with my financial outlook; my own efforts to succeed will inevitably bring me riches, with or without, a poor or rich man.
2006-09-17 12:04:30 · answer #4 · answered by wearyblossom 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe in all honesty that for most people, the money is more important than deep emotional feelings. It's just much easier to be selfish than work on keeping feelings strong, because it is a lot of work. I have been married for 14 years. All of my friends have divorced over stupid little problems that me and my wife faced head on. Some how, people began to believe that if you are no longer happy in a relationship, the relationship is over. Well my own experience has proved that wrong. People want the easy fix, even though it's really not the best fix. I believe that true love does work if your willing to and your partner are willing to make it work. Me and my wife are happier than we were when we first met and it wasn't easy getting to this point and I know there are plenty more trials ahead, but believe me it's worth everything to love and be loved in return.
2006-09-17 12:17:22 · answer #5 · answered by inluvwshana 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
True love w/ the poor guy!!! If it's real, then your life would be so much richer than any man who can offer you material wealth that is only a lukewarm relationship. Humble yourself and just allow it to happen with the one less well to do. You'll be stronger in character for it in the end, and believe it or not... more fulfilled in all life has to offer! Money is just a thing, whose to say this poor guy won't hit the jackpot of a lottery someday, and the richer one lose everything but his dirty boxer shorts! What would you ask us then?
2006-09-17 12:07:59 · answer #6 · answered by someone s 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As we have seen many times over that money cannot buy happiness... my answer is true love with a poor guy. You shouldn't take interest in someone based on their financial wealth, you can't take the money with you when you die so try to make the most out of life. Some of my best memories have been spending time with someone I care about and he didn't have to spend a dime on me.
2006-09-17 12:05:59 · answer #7 · answered by Catie 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think true love w/ the poor guy. Money can't buy you love, and the odds are that the guy you love more will treat you better. The rich one will, but his way of doing that will be showering you with gifts. It's better to have someone that you truely care for, not just for his money.
2006-09-17 12:03:03 · answer #8 · answered by sweetthang93 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would go with the rich guy and its not cause im shallow. If u love eachother but r constantly fighting about money then that love will fade and u'll start to hate eachother. If u dont have that stress on ur soso relationship it could last longer, and u could grow to love that person more
2006-09-17 12:03:09 · answer #9 · answered by cutie123 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
for one thing money do help with bills but it do not last forever, just the same as the person became rich they can become poor, and when he do become poor you are really going to not like him cause you are poor together, so go with the one that is poor, because people do not stay down forever, so go with him and you can be rich together.
2006-09-17 12:05:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would rather have true love with a poor guy. Money cant make love, love cant make money.
If it is true love, nothing should stop that love,no matter how much money the guy/girl has, no matter how they live.
Love is a very beautiful thing.
2006-09-17 12:20:37 · answer #11 · answered by Danny 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋