English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Don't tell me, its to disarmed Iraq of WMD,because the UN team didn't find any.

2006-09-17 11:29:02 · 15 answers · asked by third_eye_blind0x0 2 in Politics & Government Military

Did Saddam Husain do anything to damage America's interest?Saddam Hussian is monster in human skin but who gave America the right to police the world??

2006-09-17 11:38:08 · update #1

Leogirl, if Iraq had WMD why didn't the Iraqi use it when America attacked them. Saddam would have certainly use it if they had WMD.Leo girl, what kind of WMD did you find in Iraq?I am surprise because the experts didn't find any.

2006-09-17 11:42:46 · update #2

HEartstRING, refer to these web-sites if you still think the Bush Govt in Iraq is not for the Iraqi oil.
www.gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=417
You said the American Govt is not using the Iraqi oil , read this;
www.gravmag.com/oil.html
www.commondreams.org/views05/0317-23.htm

2006-09-17 21:25:42 · update #3

And why are the Texan oil companies doing in Iraq? Aren't the Iraqi oil companies not able to manage their own oil plants.

2006-09-17 21:32:15 · update #4

15 answers

Simple to control the oil and build permanent bases,(There are 14 under construction at present) This will give the US a very serious foothold in the area as a jumping off point in the event of bush really wants to get his hands dirty, If he's crasy that is.

By the way Leogirl, get your facts straight. The US & UK provided Saddam with the poison gas to be used against Iran. In stead Saddam used them on the Iraqi Kurds and all the US said was Tsk tsk. It was after that when Rumsfield went over to see about reopening the US embassy. Then thinking he had Daddy Bush's approval he invaded Kuwait. Big mistake. The US went as far as the Iraqi border and then told the Iraqi Shites to rise up against saddam and the US would support them They did, and the US didn't. Now the invading US forces are finding mass graves and acting like it was all Saddam's idea. These are the Shites that the US were going to help.

2006-09-17 13:54:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I think you need to research further and pay more attention to the news. There have been WMD's found in Iraq. There was also a mobile lab discovered. The links below are just a couple articles on the WMD's that have been discovered.

It had NOTHING to do with oil. We have not imported any oil into the US that came from Iraq. Yes, it's true Iraq is producing oil again, but we're not benefiting from it. It's just another step they are closer to being economically able to support themselves.

Saddam was a terrorist to the world and to his own people. He had palaces while they were all poor. His large stashes of money were found while his people starved. He murdered them just for not supporting him or believing what he did. This is why the Iraqi people have embraced us and are glad we're there. They finally have freedom. Women can walk the streets. They have power. They can vote. The kids can go to school. Plus, he DID have WMD's and a small quantity have been found. We'll never going to find them all, because there's thousands of miles of sand they could be buried under and many made it across the border into Syria.

Also, there has been factions of Al Qaeda found and captured in Iraq. There was a tie....a connection. There's also a link for that below. The final link shows Clinton's belief that back then, al qaeda was connected in Iraq.

2006-09-17 15:03:31 · answer #2 · answered by HEartstrinGs 6 · 0 1

Iraq was seen as a threat to the United States and whether or not there were WMDs who cared to stand up for Iraq and their dictator. Saddam was arrested because he is accused of heinous war crimes including using nerve gas on his own citizens. He was using most of the money made from selling oil that was supposed to be used for food and medicine to line his pockets and those of his high level officials.

2006-09-17 11:38:52 · answer #3 · answered by navysarguy 2 · 2 0

It unquestionably had not something to do with 9/11. whether bin weighted down had not finished that, there could nonetheless be American troops in Iraq. It grew to become into deliberate via the neocons whilst Clinton grew to become into nonetheless in place of work. It had lots to do with oil. If the invasion had succeeded, US could have had administration of a super element of the unfastened worldwide's oil grant, and a leaping-off component to invade Iran. the U. S. could then have had cotrol of the lion's share of the oil grant. there grew to become into additionally the money spent on weapons, and so on. and so on. Then the non-public component, Saddam wished to kill George's pappy. humorous component. After the autumn of Baghdad, and the looting started, esp interior the Baghdad Museum, the place helpful artifacts have been stolen, there wasn't something finished via American forces to quit it. there have been, although, troops preserving the Iraqi OIL MINISTRY. It grew to become into the sole government corporation that grew to become into guarded. in reality there in case you look close adequate. it fairly is merely that the jingoism gained out, and all human beings grew to become into so busy celebrating the "victory," that they ignored those little information. confident, it fairly is against the regulation; yet possibility is small that any neocons of any stature are going to be held to blame.

2016-12-15 09:33:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well they did find them, and yes Iraq used them on the Kurds, so don't sit there and tell me there weren't any. Saddam was arrested for his crimes against humanity. We went into Iraq because dear old Saddam refused to honor any of the UN resolutions that were written when we agreed to the cease fire. The reason he ignored the resolutions was because he had the UN, Russia, France and Germany on his payroll. So after 13 years of diplomatic relations we removed the murderous Ba$tard.

2006-09-17 11:36:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

It was because we got tired of all the Iraqi men having the same cheesy mustache.

2006-09-17 14:02:34 · answer #6 · answered by booboo 7 · 0 0

Oil. The government needed a boogeyman to blame bad things on. Saddam Hussain. Sure he was a bad guy, but how many ohter bad guys are there that are worse and the US does nothing about them. Oil.

2006-09-17 11:38:22 · answer #7 · answered by Vodka 3 · 2 2

He wanted to finish the job his father didn't finish in 1992, and he likes Iraq's oil!!!

2006-09-17 11:52:29 · answer #8 · answered by frankalan9999 3 · 2 1

America's leader wanted more $ from oil shares in Iraq and to cover up his inadequacy to protect the nation during 9/11.

2006-09-17 11:35:27 · answer #9 · answered by Egroeg_Rorepme 4 · 2 4

Because saddam tried to kill Jrs daddy after the first gulf war

2006-09-17 12:51:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers