English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Since the various versions disagree on some things, they can't all be correct. That's logically impossible.

And what evidence can you provide that YOUR version is the infallible one, while the others are not?

2006-09-17 10:54:20 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

John, relying on the originals doesn't help you any, so that's a cop-out.

If you knew anything about "the bible" you would know that different versions disagree on which writings should be included in the first place.

It doesn't matter if you're reading the original book of Job, if two versions disagree on whether Job is legitimate.

2006-09-17 11:01:58 · update #1

17 answers

the one which is translated wothout the aganda of supporting the doctrines of the apostasized church!


({:-[/]

2006-09-17 10:56:16 · answer #1 · answered by Tim 47 7 · 0 2

The bible is only infallible on matters of faith. All of the bible agree on that, the rest isn't really as important. If the bible disagrees on a location or how old Job is, that's not important. What's important is that agrees on the 10 commandments, the fact that Jesus rose from the dead, etc. If you manage to show me a place in the bible where it disagrees about faith, then you can talk about how infallible it is.

():-D
shadowgirl

You should have known would get out of this question, DA

2006-09-17 18:06:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No version of the bible is infallible, there are some mistakes and misquotes in nonessential areas. For example, Matthew has Jesus astride two animals on his triumphant entry into Jerusalem do to his misunderstanding of the Old Testament Scripture he sites. No such example detracts from the truth of the message of the revelation of God to man. The true message of Scripture always remains in tact and infallible.

[Heb 11:1] Faith is the realization of what is hoped for and evidence of things not seen.

Footnote:

[1] (1-40) This chapter draws upon the people and events of the Old Testament to paint an inspiring portrait of religious faith, firm and unyielding in the face of any obstacles that confront it. These pages rank among the most eloquent and lofty to be found in the Bible. They expand the theme announced in Hebrews 6:12, to which the author now returns (Hebrews 10:39). The material of this chapter is developed chronologically. Hebrews 11:3-7 draw upon the first nine chapters of Genesis (Genesis 1-9); Hebrews 11:8-22, upon the period of the patriarchs; Hebrews 11:23-31, upon the time of Moses; Hebrews 11:32-38, upon the history of the judges, the prophets, and the Maccabean martyrs. The author gives the most extensive description of faith provided in the New Testament, though his interest does not lie in a technical, theological definition. In view of the needs of his audience he describes what authentic faith does, not what it is in itself. Through faith God guarantees the blessings to be hoped for from him, providing evidence in the gift of faith that what he promises will eventually come to pass (Hebrews 11:1). Because they accepted in faith God's guarantee of the future, the biblical personages discussed in Hebrews 11:3-38 were themselves commended by God (Hebrews 11:2). Christians have even greater reason to remain firm in faith since they, unlike the Old Testament men and women of faith, have perceived the beginning of God's fulfillment of his messianic promises (Hebrews 11:39-40).
[2] Faith is the realization . . . evidence: the author is not attempting a precise definition. There is dispute about the meaning of the Greek words hypostasis and elenchos, here translated realization and evidence, respectively. Hypostasis usually means "substance," "being" (as translated in Hebrews 1:3), or "reality" (as translated in Hebrews 3:14); here it connotes something more subjective, and so realization has been chosen rather than "assurance" (RSV). Elenchos, usually "proof," is used here in an objective sense and so translated evidence rather than the transferred sense of "(inner) conviction" (RSV).

2006-09-17 18:04:08 · answer #3 · answered by Robert L 4 · 0 1

The Autographs (Hebrew for the Old Testament; Greek for the New Testament).

The different translations of the Bible are based on scholars working to translate from the Hebrew and Greek into the English (for instance) that is spoken today (as opposed to the King James English of 1611).

Cordially,
John

2006-09-17 17:57:07 · answer #4 · answered by John 6 · 1 1

John 8:32
You shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free.
John 17:3,17
This is life eternal to know thee, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou has sent. Sanctify them throught thy truth, they world is truth.

Any human with a desire to find the truth and the facts can find it, the KJV Bible 1611, has every thing any one needs to get to the heart of the matter. Paul was near blind, but he had enough eye sight to be able to get all done that he needed to get done.
No one needs the best, what ever that would be, no one needs 100 books, when 66 is enough. Common sense is a good start. I did not create anything or any body.

John 8:44
The opposite is lovers of lies and destruction and opposition to the owner of every thing that exist.

2006-09-17 18:03:46 · answer #5 · answered by jeni 7 · 0 1

the bible that can be trusted the most for the english language is the King James Version. other than that, i would have to say that the original script would be better.

2006-09-17 17:59:56 · answer #6 · answered by adrian w 4 · 2 2

No offence, but this is what we have been trying to tell you for more then 1400 years. God revealed it to Jesus (pbuh), God knows that what had been said to be a holy a book is corrupted, God revealed it to Muhammad (pbuh) in his last scripture, but you have not been listening!!!

Anyway, I know I'm not going to take you to the right path with my Yahoo! Answer, so you can just give me a thumb-down to take me off of your screen.

Peace!

2006-09-17 18:14:01 · answer #7 · answered by Weaam 4 · 0 2

None are infallible. They were written by men. Then they were translated and re translated. By, who? More men. I wonder how many of these good Christians even know that King James was gay.

2006-09-17 17:59:10 · answer #8 · answered by Gorgeoustxwoman2013 7 · 6 2

I know I have that bottle of Bailey's around here somewhere.. cheers have fun with the answers.

2006-09-17 18:00:05 · answer #9 · answered by genaddt 7 · 2 0

*sits down with Scott M and Blah, taking a handfull of popcorn*

He's so good eh?

2006-09-17 18:12:26 · answer #10 · answered by ηιgнт ѕтαя 5 · 2 0

Being a rabid Pastafarian, I wouldn't know.

2006-09-17 17:58:24 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers