2006-09-17 10:11:18 · 4 answers · asked by notdon 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
There were no commie lib then. He was just a man who wanted to have a new government or Kingdom to replace the Kingdom of Herod where the government was taking everything from the people ... much like today. He didn't care what the name of the Kingdom was, but just called it the Kingdom of Heaven. It could have been called The Kingdom of Freedom.
The economy of slavery was not good for the slaves or the slave owners. Both got a bad deal. Today, we are economically worse off than the slaves were then because most families must have both husband and wife working to pay the bills. The slaves did not have freedom and suffered under some bad owners, but they did not have to worry about expenses and had lots of free time. The owners had all the responsibility and cost of buying and maintaining the slaves. Our lives are "free" today ... after you finish working two jobs to pay for everything.
2006-09-17 10:30:28 · answer #1 · answered by Pey 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably a liberal huh?
Questions about Jesus, or Questions designed to convert or recruit people to Jesus (or even away from Jesus for that matter)are simply a waste of time. Ditto for being "saved" or trying to clarify minute points of scripture when there are so many different interpretations and editions of text. People have already decided for the most part if they believe in the fiction written in the bible. People who feel God talks to them have psychological problems because hearing voices is a psychological illness. All the major world religions have issues like this.
2006-09-20 14:53:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No he was a bi-sexual hippie who hung out with whores.
2006-09-17 17:16:34 · answer #3 · answered by rab2344 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He probably would qualify.
2006-09-17 17:16:26 · answer #4 · answered by AuroraDawn 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋