but not both, which would you choose to save?
It is an easy question, please do not try to give yourselves a third answer, just answer the question as posed please.
You have a choice to make and only have time to save either the one live crying baby or the bucket full of 100 frozen embryo's...which of the two will you choose to save????
2006-09-17 08:24:21 · 16 answers · asked by stephenjames001 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
The point is simple...independent living things are of much higher value than a blob of cells. The life that is out of the womb and living...is of much more importance than the possibility of life.
I just wonder why pro-lifers would let the living suffer in sickness while protecting embryos which (compared with a baby anyway) are worthless and not worth saving.
2006-09-17 08:36:57 · update #1
This is a great hypothetical question. I am Pro-choice, but I must say that after seeing several pro-lifers say that they would save the living baby, why would they then put the life of these embryos above the life of an adult (stem cell research)?
2006-09-17 08:49:24 · answer #1 · answered by ~ Sara ~ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd save the live baby. I am pro-life, but definitely do not think a frozen embryo is the same as a live baby.
2006-09-17 08:45:27 · answer #2 · answered by Melissa 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Very good question. It got me thinking and I came to the conclusion I would have to save the baby cos hearing a baby cry is one of the most upsetting noises I could hear.
2006-09-17 09:13:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You know, it's sad when people can't answer a simple hypothetical question. *sigh* And an interesting one at that.
I'm pro-choice but for what it's worth, I'd save the baby- obviously.
2006-09-17 08:59:30 · answer #4 · answered by horselover1416 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
while has this ever passed off? attempt a greater sensible question please.... Like in case you ought to maintain 3 hundred Peregrine Falcons or 2 million man or woman interior the third worldwide...which might you opt for for(hint, liberals chosen the Falcons and banned existence saving DDT....and tens of millions of guys, women and young ones worldwide huge died)
2016-10-15 02:33:15 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Live baby. I don't have a problem with abortion, if there is cause for it. The baby isn't a life until the second trimester.
2006-09-17 10:01:12 · answer #6 · answered by Seph7 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The live baby.
2006-09-17 08:25:45 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
living, breathing babies are more important than frozen embryo's
2006-09-17 08:26:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
the baby of course. they keep embryo's in buckets?
2006-09-17 08:34:50 · answer #9 · answered by ♥Angel♥ 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The live baby.
They are kept in freezers in reality, so therefore, safe.
2006-09-17 08:26:48 · answer #10 · answered by Princess_SomethingOrOther 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋