English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

and explain why you think this to be true

2006-09-17 08:11:47 · 34 answers · asked by brian 1 in Politics & Government Military

34 answers

500 uk marines 250 SAS and 250 SBS watch out world here we come.


Why?

Because ulike the yanks and the rest of the world marines are taught that their gun is the only thing they can really depend upon, so from Day 1 they are taught how to maintain it and use it. Other nations ie. the U.S.A think they can win wars soley on the fact they have greater long range weapons and a biggest air force(stand fast china it's air force size is unknown) but in Vietnam, Iraq and Afganistan they have been proved wrong. It's true the Israllies have experiance but look at there last fight. they lost to a bunch of rebals.

2006-09-17 08:15:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Canadian Soldiers would win for sure.
Infact, even the great leaders of the past of said the same. Canadian Soldiers with Newfoundland Attitudes would prevail in any war.
The USA has more weapons, however, the question states 1000 troops. And since, The Canadians have already invaded the Americains in the past in the war of 1812, I beleive there to be no question.
As well, in the WWII, Canadians, British and Americains all sitting atop of hill came under attack. They were losing the battle against the Germans and the Americans and British withdrew leaving the Canadians to defend the post. Over 18,000 mortars were fired that night until reinforcements arrived the very next day. The Canadians kept the hill.
The longest sniper shot was made by a Canadian at 2.4 Kilometres away. Infact, the shot was originally an Americain shot, however, He looked at the Canadian and said his shot was better. In doing so made a record.
Canadians By Far would win any battle of equal force, size and tecnology.

2006-09-17 08:14:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

It really depends on the nature of the battle and what exactly the purpose was.

Suppose for instance if we were only talking ground troops and they are fighting in a purely offensive role. I think American special forces have the unparelleled advantage in that sort of battle with the Brits running a close second. American forces are highly trained and have the most sophisticated weapons systems on the planet. The Brits are also highly trained and have similarly sophisticated forces.

If you included all branches of military, the US forces again have unparalleled advantages. Through mere air power alone, the US could defeat any force swiftly and lethally in a *conventional* battle.

In an unconventional battle, however, the US is at a disadvantage. Unfortunately, many world militaries understand they are at a mighty disadvantage fighting the US in a conventional battle and therefore result to something called "asymmetric warfare." AW is when an enemy uses unconventional strategies to overcome overwhelming disadvantages. Car bombs, improvised explosive devices (IEDs), guerilla, or hit-and-run, tactics all comprise AW. In such a battle, I think the US is at a strong disadvantage. Armies, particularly armies in the Middle East, Central Asia, and Chechnya controlled Russia could employ such tactics and wear out a much stronger foe.

If we were talking a purely defensive battle where each army was expected to defend a piece of territory, the South Koreans (and to a lesser extent North Koreans) would dominate such a conflict because their armies are defense-oriented. These armies know how to maintain an area of land and have traditionally, even in ancient times when they repelled Chinese and Japanese aggression, have been defensive armies.

2006-09-17 08:22:51 · answer #3 · answered by tau.reanb 2 · 1 1

Very difficult to say really, Modern soldiers are taught using the same or similar techniques whichever country they are from.
British soldiers tend to think first then shoot, whilst our American cousins shoot first then think about what they have done.

It would also come down to terrain and such..
If the battle was in built up areas then probably UK or USA would prevail. If it was on desert or a hot climate then Israel or Turkey would probably win.

Every country has a group of elite soldiers who are the best in the business, I shall name a few.

UK = SAS & SBS
USA = Delta force
Israel = Mossad
Australia = ASAS
New Zealand = NZSAS
French Foreighn Legion

2006-09-17 11:37:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The best army force is the Sri Lankan army.... They are soooo determined and don't even care about their own lives when facing the enemies.... They keep on attacking the tamil rebels and go forward...Once only 75 soldiers fought with 750 rebels and still they managed to win... The best army is the Sri Lankan army....

2006-09-17 08:15:34 · answer #5 · answered by Teejay 5 · 0 0

The British Army - just think how many other world leaders have trained themselves and their Officers at Sandhurst... but if you are talking about weapons - those may let them down - other countries have the AK-47 and the M-16 which are said to be far more reliable and easier to clean than the SA80 variant 2.

2006-09-17 08:21:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

ISRAEL.

They have to be.

Hugely outnumbered they have to be good,
In recent wars Israeli soldiers have repaired damaged tanks on the battlefield re manned them and got them fighting again.
Muslims have by contrast abandoned 100% functional tanks and run for it when attacked by soft skinned half tracks.
Israelis can not afford to lose the country is so small 1 defeat and Muslims will annihilate them all.
Kind of focuses the mind that.

2006-09-17 15:27:04 · answer #7 · answered by "Call me Dave" 5 · 0 0

Why are people obsessed with killing. The practise makes perfect but that means many people die.
The Israeli nation have had to fight for their existence since 1948 but they would rather be farmer or scientists or teachers to improve mankind but they have to keep on fighting even if not all their decisions have been the right ones. You can give this a thumbs up or down its how I see it but the hatred has to stop somewhere before its to late.

2006-09-17 08:40:52 · answer #8 · answered by AndyPandy 4 · 0 1

Without doubt the French Foreign Legion, I was watching a documentary about them, they completed an assault course in two hours, it took the U.S marines over six hours to complete the same course.

2006-09-17 08:56:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Isreal would win. They have been fighting since before they were a country. They have never stoped fighting. Thats not to mention they are GODs chosen people. I won't **** with them.

2006-09-17 08:23:49 · answer #10 · answered by sirus3810 3 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers