2006-09-17 07:27:45 · 14 answers · asked by mikeygonebad 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
Lucky2balive:
So...they didn't have a contigency plan to stop terrorist from attacking but they had a contigency plan to unleash on the American public in the event that that happened......you don't realize how stupid you are, do you?
2006-09-17 07:39:20 · update #1
There's been a plan for a "New World Order" years before the attacks of 9-11. That was just impetus to make it happen.
2006-09-17 07:30:56 · answer #1 · answered by Jerrysberries 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It makes me ill that a bill of that nature must be handed interior the 1st place in a rustic that calls itself unfastened. in spite of the fact that i've got no longer stumbled on any information on line regarding the bill being drafted earlier 9/11, i would not doubt it. I think of there has been a bill like this, perhaps a usual draft, floating around for a decade earlier 9/11. it would have made experience in the process the chilly conflict, as quickly as we had a actual secret agent threat.
2016-10-15 02:30:06 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Look closer into the patriot act you'll find that in the event of public outrage, ie, terrorist attack, economic collapse, NWO, ect it states that we freedom loving americans can be arrested detained indefinitely without charges being brought against us or the right to an attorney, yes we freedom loving americans can be viewed as terrorist and a threat to national security, constitutional rights can be suspended and we are at the mercy of uncle sam, sweet huh?
2006-09-17 09:32:38 · answer #3 · answered by marquita 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I really don't beleive so, although there are 1000's of various plans and details from invasion of poland or france to what to do if Fla was taken over by Cuba. So there are 1000's of plans collecting dust back from the cold war.
It gets most of its content from other works that have been used at various times, it is nothing really new
COINTELPRO
Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA)
Sedition Act of 1918
So all it proves is that we have a great government that is prepared for things that happen.
2006-09-17 07:40:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, in fact most of what the Patriot act entails was written under JFK in PO's that covered setting up detention camps for Americans in case of a major (nuke war) and other civil disruptions when needed.
2006-09-17 07:34:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes. That one little fact is the greatest argument for some sort of connection between Bush and Osama bin Laden. At the very least, the administration knew such an attack was likely in the near future. At the very worst, they have called off the hunt for Osama bin Laden because he orchestrated the attack at Bush's suggestion.
The only way either theory will be proved is if they capture Osama Bin Laden alive and able to talk. I don't expect that to happen.
2006-09-17 07:42:44 · answer #6 · answered by loryntoo 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Not if you consider the 'lame-duck' period between the two presidencies (Clinton and Bush). Also, considering the background info. as recorded in the 9-11 commission report.
Surely you must believe that a 'debriefing' of sorts must occur when the reins are passed to the next president. Info. that's not always commuicated publicly...(probably shouldn't either, less widespread panic ensues)...but the president (Republican/Democrat) is aware of through his Presidential Daily Briefings.
9-11 was the culmination of YEARS of planning...giving credit to whom credit is due/respecting how formidable your enemy is...you have to admit Osama was ingenious in that he used our resources/laws to do us harm on our own land.
2006-09-17 07:40:20 · answer #7 · answered by AILENE 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes this is true. And to shrugg it off as "well we have every contingency ready, if its needed" is a defeatest and out-of-control way rationalize what is going on right now. I mean, would that mean they are cool with a concentration camp contingency, too?
Aslo, along these lines, the plan to invade Afghanistan was signed into order on SEPT 10, 2001 FOR THE PIPELINE THAT HALIBURTON BUILT.
2006-09-17 07:41:16 · answer #8 · answered by big-brother 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, but be very scared of: Terrorists, Terrorists, Terrorists, 9-11,9-11,9-11. And nuke-lur stuff. Believe, read your Bible and go to church. Dubya and the Lord will provide.
2006-09-17 07:34:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No..... the government has plans for just about every contingency waiting to be dusted off if the needed.
2006-09-17 07:31:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋