nope but bush had to blame some body so that he could bomb, so al-qaeda was the right sort of candidate.
2006-09-20 23:27:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I don't think one way or the other as far as it being Al-Qaeda; I do know that terrorists killed people in September of 2001. I also know that the people that died in the WTC, the Pentagon, and in a field in Pennsylvania were not the only people to get violently killed that day in the United States. What happened is very sad indeed; it was an entire years worth of murdering in the US accomplished on a single day.
Since that day, murders and other violent crimes have risen drastically across the entire US and these are being committed by other terrorists - US citizens. Terror is terror no matter who is doing the terrorising. All terrorists should be brought to justice.
2006-09-20 06:48:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
From seeing the photo's of the terrorists, they were definately from the Middle East. Who ever it was, it was one of the worst crimes anyone could do. And for what purpose ??? What did many of the innocent men and women do to deserve this ? Some of the ones who died have never been found. It was an act of war and yet, some people can not accept the fact, that is was cold blooded murder. To kill people who were innocent. Some think that it was not wrong ! How can any one with a conscions feel good about it ?
2006-09-17 07:46:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Norskeyenta 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Even with the sensationalism the media has tried to show, I believe Al-Qaeda did it. I believe the planned it and purpetrated it to make a bold statement as to their intent to try and scare americans. And I am glad to see that most of us are still living our lives day to day in spite of the cowardice of their actions. I also believe they are plotting more attacks here as well as over seas. Their network is larger and more is more cohesive than we know. Look no further than the American and British citizens who have converted and are spilling the same hate messages as Osama. They have been well taught and are extremely dangerous to our democracy and to the whole world at large.
2006-09-17 07:00:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
If Al-Qaeda rather replaced into at the back of the assaults (i individually have not yet seen any defintive evidence), it replaced into often because of the fact they have been angered on the U. S., for their presence in arabic states and usually. reason the american way of life a great deal contradicts the islamistic (no longer unavoidably the islamic) way. i could say they had to create chaos and was hoping that usa could betray it rather is democratic values, which it rather is going to actual did. They in all probability did it additionally because of the fact they had to recommend their employer. there are various people in the international, who do no longer in trouble-free terms like the U. S., attack the U. S. and you're their hero they might stick to you and supply your cash.
2016-12-12 09:59:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
In the words of Jay Leno: "The CIA today said that Saddam Hussein had no involvment with Al-Qieda. Well thank goodness we knew that before we did something Crazy!"
2006-09-17 06:51:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by sergiothefish 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Which questions are you referring to - can you put some additional notes in your question and be more specific - as I want to know what you really want to know ? Like for instance do you feel responsible or something if you are a muslim ?
2006-09-20 06:59:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They have admitted to the attack many times.
2006-09-17 06:52:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yeah, like "When will the diapered chicken win at Texas Hold'Em?!?" You can ask questions all day, but that doesn't give them any validity.
2006-09-17 06:51:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Devil did it thru al qaeda
2006-09-17 06:49:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by Stephanie D 3
·
1⤊
0⤋