we are not accomplishing anything new in Iraq...no point being there. they don't want us there and we haven't done anything useful in several months. if they need a civil war, fine. i believe we should pull out and let them figure things out on their own. what do you guys think?
2006-09-17 06:20:23 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Yo Pro-Bush, listen up. Suppose you invade a house, then the bad guys from all over the neighborhood get together to kick you out. They set the house you invaded on fire. What do you do at this point? do you stay inside and burn yourself and followers? Yes? Ohh, how stupid. Exactly what republicans are doing. Or do you leave that house and try to distinguish the fire and fix it from distance? Yes? OK, now you are smart! Exactly what democrats are trying to do.
2006-09-17 13:48:05 · answer #1 · answered by Mr. J 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's a very tough call to make. Since the U.S. was the country to shatter the security, it almost seems unfair not to re-secure the security before leaving.
However, having 130,000-140,000 U.S. troops there is not a fighting force; it's a defensive force designed to keep somewhat a lid on the civil war and a poor job of it it's doing for the Iraqi citizens, especially in Baghdad. This criticism is in no way intended for the military men and women trying to do the job; they're pawns in Bush's war. I have nothing but the most utmost respect for the young soldiers and National Guard troops (especially them with their wives and husbands, children and mortgages back home) who are fighting in this dirty war.
The situation in Iraq is very similar to the situation in the former Yugoslavia in one important aspect - take away the strong man who ruled by terror (Tito and Hussein, the first by death, the second by war) and watch a country fall apart.
The nation of Iraq did not form on its own; its borders were drawn and the borders of many Middle Eastern nations, were drawn by the British and French after World War I. Opposing tribes were placed in the same nation and then expected to get along.
Imperialism at its worst!
2006-09-17 06:34:35 · answer #2 · answered by Shelley 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you think we haven't done anything useful there in the last few months then you haven't read a paper or watched the news. Our troops have stopped many of the top members of AlQueda and we are putting a hurt on the terror cells that have sprung up everywhere there. This is our 2nd time there and we must fight this war to stop these evil people. I was there the first time and fought in the war. If I wasn't disabled in the line of duty I'd be there now. It's a war worth fighting to protect our country and it's citizens. Just an opinion from someone who's been there & seen firsthand the viciousness of those people.
2006-09-17 06:28:04 · answer #3 · answered by vanhammer 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
in accordance to 3, there already replaced right into a Civil conflict there, earlier the surge quelled it, particularly. some people concern that pulling out of Iraq will reason a slaughter, equivalent to what happened whilst the U. S. pulled out of Vietnam. The Iraq conflict replaced into in all probability the incorrect conflict, in the incorrect place, on the incorrect time, for the U. S. to keep in touch in. it is to no longer say that the conflict in Afghanistan, or the greater desirable conflict on Terror are unjust, yet many people think of going into Iraq replaced right into a mistake. Saddam Hussein, although no longer a cuddly guy, had no longer something to do with 9/11. He snubbed the Muslim Al Queida, because of the fact he replaced right into a mundane (non religious) chief.
2016-12-12 09:58:59 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If we let them have a civil war who do you think will win?
Yes the bad guys, so no we can't do that.
It would be a set back.
Did you even think about this before you tried to spread this stupid propaganda.
We need a stable Iraq
We need all counties to be stable, it's better for all.
And no it's not that they don't want us there, it's that the enemy don't want us there and for good reason.
FREEDOM it's like a knife in the back to the al-Qaeda.
Do you have a problem with freedom?
Don't you want others to have what we take for granted?
And fix your E-mail. There's nothing more annoying then someone who E-mails you and not have a way to reply.
I did find your E-mail interesting and would have liked to reply to it.
2006-09-17 06:43:11 · answer #5 · answered by psych0bug 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We have come to a bad point I Believe that we Have to pull out and let them settle their own problems. These people will never turn over to a free country too many long traditions and religion. There will always b fighting there just like everywhere else in the world.
2006-09-17 06:31:07 · answer #6 · answered by warrior929 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely right, but it's never going to happen. Iraq is a very important step leading up to world war 3.
2006-09-17 06:26:56 · answer #7 · answered by oceansoflight777 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
After your gouvernment spent all that time, money, and effort to GET a civil war going, so they have an excuse to stay for as long as the oil is flowing?
You should, of course, but you won't.
2006-09-17 06:25:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i worry more about the vacuum we would leave there.who but iran or syria would fill it?
i sure don't want loony iran to have control of all that oil.
you think gas was high before!
2006-09-17 06:28:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it will happen with or without us.......question is how many of our people do we sacrifice trying to prevent the inevitable?
2006-09-17 06:22:34 · answer #10 · answered by bush-deathgrip 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋