"We call things racism just to get attention. We reduce complicated problems to racism, not because it is racism, but because it works." - Alfredo Gutierrez, political consultant, as quoted by Richard de Uriarte, The Phoenix Gazette, March 14, 1992 (quoted in The ProEnglish Advocate, 1st quarter, 2002)
2006-09-17 06:25:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by yars232c 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It only does when the person losing the argument feels it necessary to sling the label out there!
I HATE all Muslim Countries and only like the people who come from these countries that are non-Muslim and don't blow crap up! Does that make me a racist!? HELL NO! I just would like to see all the other world religions get along, because as far as I can tell, Muslims are the only ones who believe in tax, convert, and/or kill all (Infidels) who don't share the ideas and practices of their religion.
That's intolerant and incompatible with every other country's different peoples and ideals. You decide for yourself.
2006-09-17 06:18:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mr. US of A, Baby! 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
It depends on why you hate them. If you hate Mexicans because the sight of brown people people mixing with your pure white children makes you wish for the days of segregation: you're racist.
If you dislike (even deeply) a state or poeple because of what you perceive is their attitude to America or any other issue, you're not a racist (but you're probably ignorant and incapable of seeing the shades of grey in most issues).
2006-09-17 06:15:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by inpoetry1 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes of course you can. Not all of the people in one country are the same so how can you dislike all of them. If you dislike all of them just because of their race then you are racist. That is what racist means.
2006-09-17 06:06:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by malcy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Always has. Anyone who, on the basis of the actions of a few people he might have seen, condemns the entire country and thinks they all act the same, is prejudiced and a racist, pure and simple.
2006-09-17 06:10:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by oklatom 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Israel is protecting itself. The state of Israel grow to be legally created out of the dismemberment of the Ottoman Empire on the top of world conflict I. the section grow to be desolate, barren area and swamp, with some small cities and a few inhabitants, a lot of them nomads. The inhabitants considered themselves ordinarily Syrian. The Balfour assertion issued by potential of the British, who have been given the mandate over the section by potential of the League of countries. Jews have lived interior the rustic considering the fact that Biblical circumstances. The Arabs from the encircling factors have been lured to "Palestine" by potential of the marketplace and prosperity that the Jews dropped on the area. Envy, hatred and spiritual fanaticism became the Arabs against the Jews. In 1947, under tension, the British resigned their mandate. the same twelve months, the United international locations mandated partioning of the territory. The Jews, although disenchanted, familiar the partition. The Arabs rejected it and released conflict against Israel. The armies of 5 Arab international places invaded. Following the exhortations of the invaders, the Arab citizens have been given out of how hoping to return after victory grow to be attained. they'd then reclaim their components and that of the Jews, all of whom would have been killed or would have fled. Israel gained. That and that on my own is the source of the Palastinian "refugees". Had the Arabs familiar the UN partition plan, there would now have been a state of "Palestine" for the final fifty 8 years. The ought to have attained a matching point of prosperity, progression and progression as Israel. 50% of Israel's inhabitants now incorporates refugees from Morocco, Algeria, Iraq and Yemen. All have been familiar by potential of Israel with open palms and characteristic grow to prevail contributors of their society. The Palestinians refused to combine those refugees into their inhabitants and quite restrained them to "refugee camps". those there at the instant are fourth era and by way of no fault of Israel. hi, right here is an theory, why do not the Arabs get those 4th era refugees and comprise them into their society? 4th era?!? that ought to in no way take place in a better u . s ., alongside with Israel. It shows how incompetant the Palestinians are.
2016-12-18 11:55:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's ok not to like a country's political stance, views, etc.... but when you generalize an entire population based on a handful of people, it's not only racist, it's inaccurate and ignorant. That's like saying, "I don't like the US because they all belong to the KKK."
2006-09-17 06:06:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, You are not a racist, you are opinionated.All Americans have the the right to FREEDOM of SPEACH, something Yahoo is trying to take away.
2006-09-17 06:15:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don´t kow why you hate this countries, but to hate another race make a racist, not a country.
2006-09-17 06:05:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by Nic H 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
if you dont like the country u probably wont like the people and everything about them so u could be racist
2006-09-17 06:11:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by drake c 2
·
0⤊
0⤋