I'm looking for a slim camera, that I can take anywhere with me. So I'm able to just put it in my pocket, and take it to a friends house, on vacation, an amusement park, etc. And I also want it to take decent pictures. Crystal clear. Just not so big and bulky. Have an suggestions?
2006-09-17 05:38:36 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Photography
For ease of use(point and click) I would say Kodak and Canon, followed closely by Olympus. They are all in the general price (under $150 Bucks)range of each other with similar features and picture quality. It boils down to difference of design and layout of the camera itself. Canon and Olympus are both slimmer than the comparable Kodak cameras, but Kodak is a little more spacious with button layout for larger hands/fingers.
2006-09-17 05:54:36 · answer #1 · answered by Pundit Bandit 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Canon is the best, period. I have three Canon's and nothing is wrong with any of them as of yet and I have had them all quite some time. I have shot 75,000, yes thousand, photos through one of my Canon's and have not had the first problem.
2006-09-17 16:02:28 · answer #2 · answered by spenserstl 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say Kodak and Canon, amd Olympus i have used all of them
2006-09-17 13:02:02 · answer #3 · answered by vicious b 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nikon defianately, highest quality and good warranty, also large selection of accesorries.
2006-09-17 12:40:19 · answer #4 · answered by Tommy 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Canon. Hands down. But don't buy their printers though...
2006-09-18 11:27:06 · answer #5 · answered by Johnny O 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
id suggest the new canon one...its reliable,slim,extremely clear and blur-free...
2006-09-17 12:57:00 · answer #6 · answered by Amna Z 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Olympus is quite stylish & good.
2006-09-17 13:04:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋