and why is research called research, when no-one is re-doing anything?
2006-09-17 04:25:03 · 12 answers · asked by kirsti w 1 in Environment
Deeper then the question you just asked wierdo
2006-09-17 04:26:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The sea would be at the same level, because the sponges are full of water, and therefor have mass. They would have neglegable mass without being full of water, and over the whole ocean would not be significant to displace the water. Because they are in water and absorb water, their mass increases by the same amount as the water they absorb, therefor, there is no change in the sea level. To be accurate, the sea is not FULL of sponges.
Definition: re·search (rÄ-sûrch', rÄ'sûrch')
n.
Scholarly or scientific investigation or inquiry. See synonyms at inquiry.
Close, careful study.
v., -searched, -search·ing, -search·es.
v.intr.
To engage in or perform research.
v.tr.
To study (something) thoroughly so as to present in a detailed, accurate manner: researching the effects of acid rain.
To do research for: research a magazine article.
So in answer to PART Two of your question, the word research is not broken down into two separate words.
2006-09-17 11:33:42 · answer #2 · answered by Ken B 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it would be less deep. Sponges that are underwater their whole lives are totally saturated with water, so it's not as if they can absorb more.
If you took out all of the sponges and squeezed them dry, the water would go back into the sea - but the sponges themselves have some solid parts that have a volume. You're basically removing the volume of those solid parts from the ocean.
Less solid volume in the ocean -> less water being displaced by that solid volume -> lower oceans.
Think what would happen if you removed all the sharks from the sea - the water level would drop. This is the same thing.
2006-09-17 11:34:37 · answer #3 · answered by Brian L 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depth of sea is not same every where and it varies from one place to other place. The deepest point is around 10 miles deep in the sea. Second part of your question is really interesting and why don't you reply it yourself.
2006-09-17 11:29:15 · answer #4 · answered by Ramesh M 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
2 points
2006-09-17 12:33:29 · answer #5 · answered by neil d 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the same as it is now...they filter water they don't asorb it....they are made of the same 20 amino acids we are....do we asorb water? no. to answer your question about research....when people enter the training at military boot camp and enlist it is called re-up....the word research can also mean to rethink...when they search for new answer they erase the old ones....we rethink what we know and research to find new answers....get it?
2006-09-21 00:24:59 · answer #6 · answered by insertnamehere 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is derived from a French word and the re does not mean "again" as it does in English - it means more like "intensified inquiry"
2006-09-17 11:36:13 · answer #7 · answered by Skeff 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
bloody stupid question what kind of answer were you expecting
2006-09-21 07:54:13 · answer #8 · answered by srracvuee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
deeper
2006-09-17 11:31:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is what our world is coming to....
Kill me....
Kill me nooooooooooow!!
2006-09-17 11:27:08 · answer #10 · answered by USMCstingray 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋