A. the Fifth Amendment.
B. Roe v. Wade.
C. Marbury v. Arizona.
D. the First Amendment.
2006-09-17 02:56:17 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
Trick Question. None of the above
2006-09-17 03:04:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
A. The Fifth Amendment
2006-09-17 03:07:36 · answer #2 · answered by oneidacarpetguy 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A the Fifth Amendment
2006-09-17 13:36:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
A. The fifth amendment states:No person ... nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, ...
B. Roe v. Wade. is a Supreme Court case related to abortion.
C. Marbury v. Arizona is a case I don't recognize.
D. The first amendment protect the free exercise of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and the right to peaceably assemble and to petition the government.
Given these choices, A is the best.
2006-09-17 12:16:32 · answer #4 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Miranda one that was mentioned in the first answer is the court case that guarantees that people being arrested get read their rights before being questioned.
However the Right to Remain Silent is guaranteed in the 5th Amendment, hence the term "Pleading the Fifth"
2006-09-17 03:06:15 · answer #5 · answered by ModernMerlin 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A. the Fifth Amendment.
2006-09-17 03:04:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Miranda v. Arizona (1968) which applied the "due process" clause of the 14th Amendment to the states.
2006-09-17 02:58:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
the fifth amendment
2006-09-19 06:56:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are only read your rights if you are charged, and the arresting police department wants to actualy question you. You can be arrested, and not charged! Hmmmm now theres a surprise for ya aye? Ofcourse you'll be eventualy lket go if your not charged, but you can be arrested!
2006-09-17 03:04:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Miranda vs the US. Supreme court ruling. Self incrimination. Note that it would only take another supreme court ruling to reverse.
2006-09-17 04:07:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋