2006-09-17 01:44:24 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Environmentally friendly weapons???!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!I
Of course! Make everyone die laughing!!
2006-09-17 02:38:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't know how firearms can be environmentally friendly. Anything that disrupts a naturally existing environment is not environmentally friendly. I believe that no weapon is environmentally friendly. Guns, for example, cause a loud bang, hence noise pollution even if it is just for a second. Next, the ammo contains lead, which is poisonous to any living creature, hence why pregnant weapon should not handle a gun, it can have serious effects on her child and her pregnancy. Too much of anything causes change in the environment and weapons are designed to cause change, no weapon is environmentally friendly. Though using a gun in a hundred acre woods is not going to cause too much change to the surrounding environment, but when you create a situation where there are 1,000 guns going off in a hundred acre woods, then there will be profound impact on that environment.
2006-09-23 12:55:18 · answer #2 · answered by K_S 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Catridgeless, like "metal storm," iron dum dum bullets (shh don't let the Geneva convention heat about dum dum bullets) with a copper coating (to protect the barrel). The only metal would be the bullet that would mostly (except for the copper) break apart and rust to nothing in a few decades or less.
There is also the airgun that could shoot poison darts. Bacteria poison would degrade fairly quickly and if it's wood, it would rots fairly quickly.
2006-09-17 17:44:00 · answer #3 · answered by gregory_dittman 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
U know nothin is environmental friendly....
U take anythin in life, nothin is environmental friendly ....U can just say only which will make less problems to environment..ok?
u c anythin even ur house is builted only by digging and killing many insects and their family and causin som damages to environment
and one main thin is ANY WEAPONS are environment enemies any weapons...so there is no friendly qn rise here??
2006-09-17 01:54:43 · answer #4 · answered by siberdice 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Pea Shooters , Water Pistols and Roller Skates
2006-09-22 05:12:16 · answer #5 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
An environmentally friendly weapon could be cow poop that you shoot out of a big hose. I would be really nasty to the person it hit but it would make the grass grow better around the person, the environment. haha.
2006-09-17 01:48:05 · answer #6 · answered by kangnamsuperman 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Only those weapons that destroy Human Beings without damage to animals and plants!!
2006-09-17 01:48:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
a Sh*t cannon. The Belgian and French actually used such contraptions during WW1
2006-09-17 02:55:28 · answer #8 · answered by peter gunn 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bows and arrows?
Cudgels?
Preferably wielded by the two heads of state who want to fight the battle, leaving everyone else to get on with their lives.
2006-09-17 03:24:24 · answer #9 · answered by cymry3jones 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Diplomatic words ending stupid fights and giving solutions, Harming those who are guilty and receiving support from people that would be or are harmed by a fight (like bombardment of civilians).
2006-09-17 02:07:11 · answer #10 · answered by Robert M Mrok (Gloom) 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
probably a weapon which can snuff out human and animal life and leave buildings and vegetation intact
2006-09-17 01:48:52 · answer #11 · answered by zak_z 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋