English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Both never knew their father
Both were raised by adoptive parents
Both married old widows with religious and political influence
Both started their own religion
Both declared themself to be a prophet
Both had sexual relations with very young girls
Both had a band of gullible militant followers

Now, how are these two psychopaths different?

2006-09-16 20:30:43 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Take a good look at Artist's answer. Everything she says is false except the part about them inventing soap. Everything else is borrowed from the Greeks. See what they teach their followers? LOL

2006-09-16 20:54:50 · update #1

18 answers

Mohammed murdered for his religion. David Koresh was murdered for his religion.

2006-09-16 20:33:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 7

david koresh and his people were murdered by the feds.mohammad was not, allah, god, sugmod,, krisna, prana ,mana, and all the other three hundred names for god on this particular planet. be praised .have you read the qur'an if you have nt you really should I am reading one and it is all very positive spiritual stuff so far. there are many religious nuts the muslims are especially sensitive aren t they. put them down they kill people, god is love not hate forgiveness not murder,theyshould not only read there qur'an but should accually do what it says, it is wrong for bush to kill.to bomb a hundred thousand innocents to deathto take ou t one man,this kind ofthing pisses them off, would it make you angry if they bombed georgia an d killed thousands I think so but WE can do it and it s ok? I dont get that reasoning, isreal bombs a whole country cause a few men were takn ? Idont getit, you justdont kill massive amounts ofpeople like that and we think they should just take it, well I would nt so Idont expect them to.

2006-09-17 03:50:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

No expert on Mohammed, and little interest. David Koresh was a whacko who got wacked - just a shame he dragged so many others down with him in his pathetic little escapade.

2006-09-17 17:20:03 · answer #3 · answered by intelligent_observer 3 · 1 1

Muhammad didn't have Sex with Aisha until she was in her late teens early twenties. The Islamic world was a place for learning, the bank, soap, Geomtry and Algebra, and Women's voting rights were all pioneered by the time of the Prophet. In his time, Christian, Jews, And Muslims live peaceful side by side. Many Christian And Jewish Believers converted to Islam after researching scripture and realizing he had been send as the last prophet. He was welcomed into Medina by the Christians whom trusted him. They renamed it the city of the prophet.

2006-09-17 03:41:20 · answer #4 · answered by Muse 4 · 3 3

Stop sniffing glue. You are only insulting Muslims with your repeated derogatory questions about them. Hypocrite!

2006-09-17 06:07:15 · answer #5 · answered by SB 7 · 2 0

Insulting David Koresh does nothing for you.

Insulting and lying about the Holy Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) earns you a place in the hellfire for the rest of you damned life!

2006-09-17 04:09:34 · answer #6 · answered by Mustafa 5 · 5 4

Mohammad, didn't have to deal with a fascist government.

2006-09-17 03:43:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

DAvid had guns. Mohammad had swords.

2006-09-17 03:42:33 · answer #8 · answered by peach49444 3 · 5 1

Thomas Carlyle in 'Heroes and Hero Worship and the Heroic in History,' 1840
"The lies (Western slander) which well-meaning zeal has heaped round this man (Muhammad(saaw) are disgraceful to ourselves only." "A silent great soul, one of those who cannot but be earnest. He was to kindle the world, the world’s Maker had ordered so."

Mahatma Gandhi, a statement published in 'Young India,'1924.
"I wanted to know the best of the life of one who holds today an undisputed sway over the hearts of millions of mankind.... I became more than ever convinced that it was not the sword that won a place for Islam in those days in the scheme of life. It was the rigid simplicity, the utter self-effacement of the Prophet(saaw), the scrupulous regard for pledges, his intense devotion to his friends and followers, his intrepidity, his fearlessness, his absolute trust in God and in his own mission. These and not the sword carried everything before them and surmounted every obstacle. When I closed the second volume (of the Prophet's biography), I was sorry there was not more for me to read of that great life."

Dr. William Draper in 'History of Intellectual Development of Europe'
"Four years after the death of Justinian, A.D. 569, was born in Mecca, in Arabia, the man who, of all men, has exercised the greatest influence upon the human race... To be the religious head of many empires, to guide the daily life of one-third of the human race, may perhaps justify the title of a Messenger of God."

W. Montgomery Watt in 'Muhammad(saaw) at Mecca,' Oxford, 1953.
"His readiness to undergo persecution for his beliefs, the high moral character of the men who believed in him and looked up to him as a leader, and the greatness of his ultimate achievement - all argue his fundamental integrity. To suppose Muhammad(saaw) an impostor raises more problems than it solves. Moreover, none of the great figures of history is so poorly appreciated in the West as Muhammad(saaw) is.. Thus, not merely must we credit Muhammad(saaw) with essential honesty and integrity of purpose, if we are to understand him at all, if we are to correct the errors we have inherited from the past, we must not forget that conclusive proof is a much stricter requirement than a show of plausibility, and in a matter such as this only to be attained with difficulty."

K. S. Ramakrishna Rao in 'Muhammad(saaw): The Prophet of Islam,' 1989
"My problem to write this monograph is easier, because we are not generally fed now on that (distorted) kind of history and much time need not be spent on pointing out our misrepresentations of Islam. The theory of Islam and sword, for instance, is not heard now in any quarter worth the name. The principle of Islam that “there is no compulsion in religion” is well known."

Jules Masserman in 'Who Were Histories Great Leaders?' in TIME Magazine, July 15, 1974
"Perhaps the greatest leader of all times was Muhammad(saaw), who combined all the three functions. To a lesser degree Moses(as) did the same."

Gibbon in 'The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire' 1823
"The good sense of Muhammad(saaw) despised the pomp of royalty. The Apostle of God submitted to the menial offices of the family, he kindled the fire, swept the floor, milked the ewes, and mended with his own hands his shoes and garments. Disdaining the penance and merit of a hermit, he observed without effort of vanity the abstemious diet of an Arab"

2006-09-17 03:41:41 · answer #9 · answered by marissa 5 · 2 3

MS JENNY PROPHET MUHAMMED was the best person and the best PROPHET OF ALLAH u are saying this because u have no information about ISLAM and also to MR HELLO who answer u i want to tell u one thing GOD has given ur braines to us it go and search on it go read QURAN many people many people who us to tell ISLAM is bad and etc after reading QURAN they converted and started sayinf there life were in dark before converting to ISLAM ISLAM is the light in the dark world that why today in west many many people are converting and in all of them 60% are womens the reasion coz ISLAM is the only religion which gives u full right to women read about it r bfore its to late
peace

2006-09-17 03:32:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5 5

So many Muslims seem to have an answer for you, I thought I would add a link to prove your point. http://judgeright.blogspot.com

2006-09-17 03:45:44 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers