What a poor choice of words to combine, by the Bush administration. It's a contradiction in principals of both. It shows ignorance in separating the political from the religious practices.
So far, no definition in the dictionary as of today ...
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=islamofascist
2006-09-16 08:54:21 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
It is name calling by agressive war mongers. A perfect example of fasism is our current government where the mercants are in controll with help from their banker buddies. That and saying look over there, the problem is out there is the usual mercahnt retoric for look at that while I pick your pocket. We are soooo stupid. History teaches us nothing cuz we do not know it.
2006-09-16 08:59:33 · answer #1 · answered by icheeknows 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Fascism (from dictionary.com): a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.
What is Islamofacism? Take the definition above, insert "fundamentalist Islamic" before "dictator," and replace "nationalism" with "religious fanaticism."
What you end up with is a very good description of the Taliban regime in Afghanistan and the current regime of Iran.
2006-09-16 09:08:13 · answer #2 · answered by scifiguy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Fathead has it exactly right. And your pretense of ignorance is as transparent as the Islamofascists' pretense of murdering in self-defense.
By the way, since you claim to be familiar with the dictionary, look up the words 'principal' and 'principle'.
2006-09-16 09:04:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
These are some of Bush democratic achievements in Iraq:
http://alsaha.fares.net/sahat?14@200.xAgbfPqhRGN.0@.2cc166d4
2006-09-16 09:50:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it is a quite accurate term to describe the distortion of Islam into a PURELY political system bent on world domination.
The ignorance demonstrated is entirely on the part of the questioner.
2006-09-16 08:57:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Dude its just another way to label someone who hates Americans. The words separately are fine, when combined its taking a jab or using a derogatory comment. Its like me saying this is a stupid question.
2006-09-16 08:58:52 · answer #6 · answered by patrick 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
i think after they capture the bad guy they can give us a lesson on how a captured islamofascist was just as bad as islamoterrorist
until then id prefer they go find em
2006-09-16 09:05:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
CNN and other western media while reporting about terrorists, use words like "islamists", "jihadists", "mujahids"..etc The purpose of this kind of reporting is to link Terrorism and all the brutal acts of terrorists with Islam in the mind of the viewers. They especially like the word "islamists" since it has the word Islam in it. And they say they are not fighting Islam... and they expect Muslims not to be angry when they bomb their countries....
Try and observe next time when you watch CNN.
2006-09-16 09:26:22 · answer #8 · answered by ATK 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
obama is one too. Name calling jerk. Thinks he is best thing going. They need to prosecute him and hillary giving them matching orange jumpsuits in prison
2017-01-30 16:50:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can't expect anything intelligent from Bush. Bush is a Moron.
He is man of few phrases.
Bring 'em on.
We are winning against terrorists.
Democracy on the march. (Iraq and Afghanistan is the good example of that decocracy march which has completely destroyed by Bush invasion.)
We have liberated 50 million people in Afghanistan and Iraq.(Can someone tell this Moron that he had occupied 50 million people not liberated.)
I added few more for thumbs downs which means this is all truth.
2006-09-16 08:57:29 · answer #10 · answered by A K 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋