Cleavage is the devil's playground.
2006-09-16 02:49:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Peace Frog 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
It's ok to show neck but not cleavage, collarless blouse or collared, no cleavage. Generally, it's also more respectful to have some sleeve even if it's a short sleeve. No sleeve makes it look like you're on your way to the beach or a picnic.
2006-09-16 09:51:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Zero cleavage is 'the proper amount of cleavage to be shown at' not only church but everywhere outside the home. What or who is the cleavage to be shown for? What motive?
2006-09-16 11:03:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by WEBBADGER 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
OK, church is a place to worship God, not a fashion show!!! But I think the collarless blouse is probably the best choice!!!!!!!!
2006-09-16 09:50:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
collarless blouse-showing neck no cleavage
2006-09-16 09:49:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by gabby 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
How many buttons on
a blouse /shirt to leave open?
How "insensitive"!
Church is a place of worship,
not a bar, nor a pick-up-place!
Though, there are churches
with single clubs..but...
not in the church (building)
itself..
Why not "try" to impress
yourself by looking....
as a worthwhile worshiper
instead of a desperate chick!
2006-09-16 09:58:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by just me here 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
3 buttons is perfect. It's just enough to challenge the breastless ones to practice their good faith and not be jealous.
2006-09-16 09:50:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by nora22000 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
there is no "proper" cleavage for church viewing
its the Lords house. show some respect
2006-09-16 09:50:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mopar Muscle Gal 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
I'm going to have to go with no cleavage. Looking "sexy" for church is disrespectful and inappropriate.
2006-09-16 09:50:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Nunya 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
I am catholic, and we are supposed to have no skin showing above the chest. Well I mean like sleveless shirts or dresses. So it would be improper to wear anything that shows more than you feel would be wrong.
2006-09-16 09:52:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by mary a 2
·
1⤊
1⤋