English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Just recieved my DNA papers in the mail on the guy i KNOW is the father because of the time by mine and my doctor's date of conception, its impossible to be someone else's. Also during the process the caseworker had asked us to not let her drink anymore sweet juice because it can alter the results but she already drunk half and i was thinkining it would wear off but it was about 10 minutes when the sample collector called us to the back.

2006-09-16 02:14:35 · 12 answers · asked by AmAnDa 2 in Health Other - Health

Thats just it the people who did refuse to give me another test. But i want a blood test to prove once in for all. One of aunts went through the same thing and they tried to claim her crazy and they did 4 more tests 3 more swabs which were all negative and the last one blood which proved the swabs wrong, she knew what she was saying. I think ima have to get a lawyer

2006-09-16 02:20:30 · update #1

Thats just it! The only other person is Jesus Christ! and we all know thats not possible. Or immaculent conception and we know that cant happen either, but i tell u this my baby be 2 tomorrow, she was born sept.17th ,her due date was sept,19th, i got pregnant Dec.25th, 03 christmas night i was pregnant exactly 39 wks and 5 dayz, which is 278 dayz average pregnancy lasts from 266 (38 wks) to 280 dayz (40 wks) the proof is in da countback. but i thank u guys for your feedback -smiles-

2006-09-16 02:31:44 · update #2

12 answers

Not the DNA itself. But even when they are as careful as
possible. There is still human error. I personally watched a guy
test two guys for drugs, and he mixed them up. So you could
get results that aren't yours, if someone accidentally put the
wrong name on the test results, or folder. Common human
errors.

2006-09-16 02:19:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The DNA mutation you talk of might additionally try unfavorable for you being the mother, on the grounds that's a situation time-honored via fact the 'vanishing twin' syndrome, the place the mother includes 2 thoroughly diverse DNA profiles. So no, DNA mutation does not play an significant function in terms of fake negatives for dad, i've got in hassle-free terms heard of circumstances the place mom passes that gene or despite alongside to their toddlers. once you're particular he's the father (meaning that is honestly impossible considering which you probably did not have intercourse with all people different than him around the time you could have become pregnant, that includes a minimum of a month previous to changing into pregnant) then I quite do not see the element in having one--he ought to believe you sufficient to appreciate you weren't messing around. yet to respond to your question, in case you have faith there's a mistake interior the try you could continually ask to have it repeated. in spite of the undeniable fact that, it would be fairly uncommon for a DNA you should be that a strategies off. that's often ninety 9.9999% precise via fact of variables, however the DNA chains ought to experience heavily if he's the dad and you are the mother. it is not a precise technological expertise, yet I quite have not at all heard of fake DNA try for that except the guy being examined unquestionably wasn't the father. solid success.

2016-10-15 01:33:32 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

DNA can never be wrong... Of course people make mistakes. You can go elsewhere and get another sample done if that will make u feel better about the lab caseworker

2006-09-16 02:17:51 · answer #3 · answered by Lea 4 · 0 0

Nope, sorry, but it is what it is.
You might have ovulated at a different time than you thought you had, therefore whoever you slept with might be the father.
You may want to have the other person checked.

2006-09-16 02:18:06 · answer #4 · answered by pouncermom 3 · 0 0

DNA is as pure a gold there are no false results and every test is 99.9999999999% accurate

2006-09-16 02:16:40 · answer #5 · answered by oceanlady580 5 · 0 0

As far as I know the only way they can be wrong is by swab swapping.

2006-09-16 02:16:29 · answer #6 · answered by Mr. Peachy® 7 · 0 0

striaght from the source then no but if the DNA was gathered from another source than yes it could be.

2006-09-16 02:24:00 · answer #7 · answered by Speedy 3 · 0 0

Have the test done again.

2006-09-16 02:16:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yes

2006-09-16 02:17:17 · answer #9 · answered by ang 4 · 0 0

its proff positive. its not likely mislabeled

2006-09-16 02:20:06 · answer #10 · answered by blank 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers