English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-16 00:07:41 · 49 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health Other - Health

49 answers

an arm providing it was my left....lol

2006-09-16 00:09:25 · answer #1 · answered by askaway 6 · 1 0

I wouldn't want to break any of my bones let alone an arm or a leg. Fractures can get nasty especially if the broken bits of the bone come out through the skin as can happen.

To answer your question I would prefer not to break any bones not even an arm or a leg.

Ouch painful question.

2006-09-16 00:19:43 · answer #2 · answered by tunisianboy46 5 · 0 0

Hi , I would rather break a leg cos this is saying for good luck when you go on stage etc,!Igroke my arm when i was 18 and was in plaster for 9 months!it was my fault, iwas was working in Scotland,and went out for a drink,i had to sleep in my work van cos i was to tight to pay for b and b,i came out of the pub and saw my van and jumed over a three foot high wall!yes you guessedit ,i fell 20 foot over the other side !!!(broke 11 bones)moral of the story is don't drink and jump!!!
have a nice weekend

2006-09-16 00:28:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Neither, but if i had to break one and had the choice it would be arm. I could still get about that way, besides i've already broke a leg.

2006-09-16 00:17:36 · answer #4 · answered by bambam 5 · 0 0

a arm I already broke a leg it's a pain to get around when you have medal rods hanging out your leg and they keep getting hung up on something.......unless you mean break a leg or arm on somebody else then a leg

2006-09-16 00:11:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Oh definately an arm. You have to have crutches and all sorts for a leg and its such a cufuffle! I had a broken arm once and it wasn't that bad

...and the pain killers were great!

2006-09-16 00:23:00 · answer #6 · answered by mother knowledge 3 · 0 0

My arm because.... legs take a very long time to heal and they can be difficult....at least if I broke an arm I would still mobile.....if I broke my dominant hand I would have to learn to use the other and would end up ambidextrous - Hooray!

2006-09-16 00:18:48 · answer #7 · answered by Amoeba 3 · 0 0

breaking an arm would be less hassle than breaking a leg however breaking a leg would get me more time off work, lol!

2006-09-16 00:16:55 · answer #8 · answered by pinklilyhun 2 · 0 0

had a broken leg already, and it sucked, so I suppose I would like a broken arm next time! Just as long as it aint my right arm, I use that hand for playing!

2006-09-16 00:43:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Having done both I can say this,

If its one arm or one leg then an arm everytime. You can still get around easily etc.

if its both arms or both legs then the legs have it ( you cant even wipe your ---- if your arms are in plaster)

Maintaining your independance and dignity have it )

2006-09-17 22:11:39 · answer #10 · answered by commentator 2 · 0 0

Neither. I'd rather break my right arm than my left (I'm left handed), but I still wouldn't be able to get around breaking either as I wouldn't be able to drive.

2006-09-16 00:10:43 · answer #11 · answered by little_jo_uk 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers